<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>British Journal of Social Work - Advance Access</title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>British Journal of Social Work - RSS feed of articles</description>
<prism:eIssn>1468-263X</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>British Journal of Social Work</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0045-3102</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp077v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp066v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp064v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp065v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp061v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp062v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp063v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp050v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp060v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp049v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp047v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp044v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp045v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp043v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp042v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp039v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp038v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp036v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp010v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp007v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp008v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp009v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp004v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn164v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp005v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn163v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp003v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp001v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn176v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp002v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn146v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn165v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn178v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn177v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn162v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn160v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn149v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn148v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn143v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn147v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn144v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn139v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn142v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn141v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn140v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn137v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn133v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn136v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn135v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn130v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn134v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn132v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn115v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn131v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn129v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn121v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn118v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn119v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn117v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn116v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn081v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn102v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn103v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn114v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn106v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn101v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn100v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn098v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn084v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn096v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn097v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn085v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn082v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn079v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn080v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn056v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn058v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn073v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn059v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn057v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn026v3?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn027v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn053v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn051v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn054v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn033v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn038v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn036v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn031v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn034v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn032v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn030v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn029v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn028v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm171v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn016v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm152v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn013v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm170v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn023v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn017v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn021v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm157v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm158v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm155v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm154v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm153v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm156v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm149v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm144v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm148v1?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp077v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards and People with Dementia: Implications for Social Worker]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp077v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper looks at the implications of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards, (which are an extension of the Mental Capacity Act 2005), for older people with dementia. The safeguards are likely to apply to a small minority of people with dementia. They involve a thorough assessment process by qualified and experienced professionals. Other aspects of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 that are protective of people with dementia who are found to lack capacity to decide on care home entry, will also be discussed. Despite the welcome protection afforded by the Mental Capacity Act, older people who lack capacity and who are placed in care homes, do not benefit from the same level of checks and balances that people have who are sectioned under the Mental Health Act 1983.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dwyer, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp077</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards and People with Dementia: Implications for Social Worker]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp066v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adult Mental Health in a Changing International Context: The Relevance to Social Work]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp066v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ramon, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp066</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adult Mental Health in a Changing International Context: The Relevance to Social Work]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Critical Commentaries</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp064v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Keeping Service User Involvement in Research Honest]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp064v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Service user research has increasingly become a significant development on the research landscape. This article seeks to critically examine this development and to identify ways in which service user research can retain its honesty and avoid the twin dangers of either becoming a tokenistic exercise or being seen as a panacea. In particular the article highlights issues concerning our conceptions of service users, recognising both the benefits and costs of service user involvement in research and begins to open up discussions on the contribution of service user research to knowledge development. The article also argues that we need to subject such research to the same standards of scrutiny and critique we would apply to other research approaches if service user research involvement in research is going to develop further.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McLaughlin, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp064</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Keeping Service User Involvement in Research Honest]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp065v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Social Work Ethical Decision Making in an Inter-Disciplinary Context]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp065v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In order to strengthen social work students' competence in ethical reasoning, three inter-disciplinary seminars were organised in which a group of final-year social work and nursing undergraduates jointly discussed and reflected on ethical decision making. Both social work and nursing students respected a client's rights to make decisions and choices, but they attributed different priority to this ethical principle when it came to making decisions on which professional intervention was based. Social work students continued to regard self-determination as the primary principle, whereas nursing students made a shift in principle from autonomy to a duty to care. The differences in applying professional values are conceived as the result of a web of personal, cultural, professional and organisational features. It is suggested that both the theory and practice of social work ethical decision making can be advanced by more individual reflection grounded on a plurality of perspectives.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yeung, K. S. S., Ho, A. P. Y., Lo, M. C. H., Chan, E. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp065</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Social Work Ethical Decision Making in an Inter-Disciplinary Context]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp061v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Supporting the Birth Relatives of Adopted Children: How Accessible Are Services?]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp061v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper focuses on how birth relatives in England and Wales can access adoption support services, using data obtained from a mapping study of adoption support services. The survey aimed to gather data from all local authority adoption agencies, voluntary adoption agencies and adoption support agencies in the second half of 2005. The questionnaire included questions relating to how local authorities provided birth relative support services, how birth relatives could access them and how agencies promoted them. The response rate was 63 per cent. Answers to open questions relating to the provision of services and access were examined. Four patterns were found in relation to local authority arrangements for provision of services and the role of the independent sector in these. Seven different models of accessing services were identified. Low uptake of services was found to be a problem and the advantages and disadvantages of the different models of accessing services are discussed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cossar, J., Neil, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp061</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Supporting the Birth Relatives of Adopted Children: How Accessible Are Services?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp062v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Certain Moment: Some Personal Reflections on Aspects of Residential Childcare in the 1950s]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp062v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The paper's point of departure is the residential care of children&mdash;and especially girls and young women&mdash;during the 1950s. The approach of what was then known as The Church of England Children's Society is reviewed in light of its origins in Victorian philanthropy, and this is linked to the author's memories of the life of a person responsible for running one of the Society's homes. Her working life stretched from when the Society's founder was still an influential force to the late 1950s by which time the foundations for the &lsquo;modern&rsquo; approach to looked-after children had been laid. The moral certainties that underpinned the approach at the home are considered, including the merits of such clarity, despite these appearing to contemporary eyes so limiting. This &lsquo;backwardness&rsquo; is set alongside the concerns that are voiced today about the widely seen failings of modern residential care, particularly for girls and young women. Drawing on the work of Gramsci, the paradoxical inversion of the &lsquo;reactionary&rsquo; past and the &lsquo;progressive&rsquo; present are considered in terms of a contrast between an earlier clarity borne of faith and conviction and a contemporary hesitancy towards the enforcement of norms and values that are unendingly contested.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Webb, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp062</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Certain Moment: Some Personal Reflections on Aspects of Residential Childcare in the 1950s]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp063v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['My Son Gave Birth to Me': Offending Fathers--Generative, Reflexive and Risky?]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp063v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper analyses key findings from narrative intrviews with 16 (ex) offender fathers. All fathers interviewed served custodial sentences, ranging from 6 months to 14 years, and were on licence at the time of interview. This research focuses on the ways in which this group of marginal men reflect on their perceptions, practices and aspirations as fathers. It seeks to understand how they make sense of fathering in the context of criminality. The research shows that the social, cultural and economic context in which many of these men are parenting is very complex and demanding. It points to the impact of prison on their relationships with their children and partners and highlights the role of their families in supporting their parenting/fathering. In this paper I argue firstly, that the &lsquo;costs of crime/imprisonment&rsquo; for many of these men is very high and secondly, that fathering can be productive, resourceful and generative in the &lsquo;context of offending&rsquo;, where the deficit model of fathering is the norm.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walker, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp063</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA['My Son Gave Birth to Me': Offending Fathers--Generative, Reflexive and Risky?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp050v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Help-Seeking by Foster-Carers for their 'Looked After' Children: The Role of Mental Health Literacy and Treatment Attitudes]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp050v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Factors that influence the help-seeking steps for looked after children with mental health problems were explored within the context of a help-seeking model, as were foster-carers' Mental Health Literacy (MHL) and help-seeking attitudes. Using a cross-sectional and between groups design, data on variables likely to be related to help-seeking by foster-carers were collected from a sample of 113 foster-carers and 108 looked after children within the East of England. Results demonstrated that although foster-carers had high MHL overall, it did not significantly influence the first help-seeking step of &lsquo;problem detection&rsquo;. More favourable help-seeking attitudes significantly influenced the second help-seeking step of &lsquo;perceived need&rsquo; for Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS). The results from the logistic regression analyses found MHL and help-seeking attitudes, in combination with the presence and impact of a mental health problem, and foster-carer education, to be significant predictors of specific help-seeking. Forty-nine per cent of children were found to have an apparent mental health problem and were not receiving a service from CAMHS. As such, both MHL and help-seeking attitudes have important roles to play in facilitating CAMHS use by this population.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bonfield, S., Collins, S., Guishard-Pine, J., Langdon, P. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp050</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Help-Seeking by Foster-Carers for their 'Looked After' Children: The Role of Mental Health Literacy and Treatment Attitudes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp060v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An Audit of Assessment and Reporting by Approved Social Workers (ASWs)]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp060v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper examines the routine practice of Approved Social Workers (ASWs) in adult mental health services in Northern Ireland. It begins with a review of existing literature on the ASW role before describing how a retrospective audit, using a mixed methods approach, was used to collect data on eighty-four assessments carried out to determine whether compulsory admission to hospital was needed. Respondents were also asked to consider how such assessments might be affected by proposed changes to the law in this field. The key findings highlighted a number of areas of practice that may be improved. There were inconsistencies in how the assessments were recorded and an uneven distribution of workloads across ASWs. Some problems were identified with inter-agency working and, in a quarter of the assessments, the ASW reported having felt afraid or at risk. The authors make a number of recommendations, which include: the use of a standard reporting procedure; that organisations should consider how to deliver a more even distribution of ASW workload; that protocols should be developed that ensure that ASWs are not left alone in potentially risky situations; and that joint assessments with General Practitioners should be required, rather than just recommended.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davidson, G., Campbell, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp060</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An Audit of Assessment and Reporting by Approved Social Workers (ASWs)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp049v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Social Work Profession and Subjective Well-Being: The Impact of a Profession on Overall Subjective Well-Being]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp049v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This research analyses social work practitioners' workplace experiences of their subjective well-being (SWB), the social scientific concept of happiness. From an initial survey of 700 Canadian social workers, thirteen respondents with the highest SWB scores were interviewed. Respondents reported that their high SWB scores were partially a result of available practice opportunities associated with the profession, their ability to recognise professional boundaries and limitations, the role of specific practices that are associated with the profession of social work, social work principles and respondents' perception of their professional self. The conclusion considers implications for workplace practices, social work education and further research.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Graham, J. R., Shier, M. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp049</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Social Work Profession and Subjective Well-Being: The Impact of a Profession on Overall Subjective Well-Being]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp047v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Awareness, Acceptance and Action: Developing Mindful Collaborations in International HIV/AIDS Research and Service]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp047v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Responses to the global pandemic of HIV/AIDS are enhanced when all parties have opportunities to express their needs and goals, assess their capacities for contributing to desired change and recruit support where resources, skills or expertise are required. The sense of urgency, strongly held beliefs and deeply seated anxieties that often accompany HIV-related illness challenge potential collaborators to be both mindful and strategic as they work together for success. Key concerns associated with international social work collaboration are examined with attention to mindfulness principles of awareness, acceptance and action. Emphasis is placed on developing awareness of complex motivations and on making accurate personal, social and environmental assessments. Collaborators are encouraged to accept the implications of culturally derived preconceptions, act intentionally, based on realistic expectations for partners' contributions, and sustain momentum over the long haul. Recommendations are offered for planning and implementing respectful international collaborations in HIV/AIDS service and research.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abell, N., Rutledge, S. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp047</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Awareness, Acceptance and Action: Developing Mindful Collaborations in International HIV/AIDS Research and Service]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-05-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp044v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Recognizing the Limitations of the Political Theory of Recognition: Axel Honneth, Nancy Fraser and Social Work]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp044v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A number of writers, located within the field of social work, have suggested that the ethics and politics of recognition provide a body of theorization that can assist social workers in their day-to-day encounters with the users of social services. However, within social and political theory, the literature on recognition has generated a rich and complex critical literature, which, to date, has been neglected within this emerging social work discourse on the theme. This article, therefore, will seek to extend the existing theoretical parameters by drawing attention to some of the contemporary critiques directed at recognition theorists. In this context, it will be maintained that the contributions of Axel Honneth, whose theorization is being promoted with social work, is problematic because it is prone to what is termed &lsquo;psychologization&rsquo;. In contrast, the feminist theorist, Nancy Fraser, has provided a more convincing articulation of recognition that also gels, in part, with the more persuasive accounts of the multifaceted nature of oppression and subjugation present in the discourse of social work. In conclusion, however, it will be maintained that recognition theory, tending to focus too exclusively on micro encounters and interactions, pays insufficient attention to the role of the neo-liberal state.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garrett, P. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp044</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recognizing the Limitations of the Political Theory of Recognition: Axel Honneth, Nancy Fraser and Social Work]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp045v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Editorial]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp045v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blyth, E., Masson, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp045</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Editorial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp043v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Editorial]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp043v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kemshall, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp043</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Editorial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp042v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mental Health and Older Women: The Challenges for Social Perspectives and Community Capacity Building]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp042v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Older women tend to be either rendered invisible in relation to considerations of mental health or, conversely, constructed as potential mental health problems. In this article, we draw attention to the position of older women with regard to current debates in the mental health field. It is argued that, within the UK and Australia, the prioritization of the management of risk and what an older woman cannot do rather than what she can adversely affects not only her mental well-being, but also the contribution that she can make to the community in which she lives. We argue that the fostering of strengths-based community capacity building, which includes proactive, innovative and flexible underpinning practice principles, has the capacity to expand rather than reduce horizons for older women, to confront restrictive and discriminatory barriers and to enhance quality-of-life factors.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fawcett, B., Reynolds, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp042</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mental Health and Older Women: The Challenges for Social Perspectives and Community Capacity Building]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp039v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Expected Working Life of a Social Worker]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp039v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article reports on an innovative way to measure the expected working life of social workers and social care professionals using a methodology already developed in studies of health care professionals. Previous work has estimated that the expected working life of a doctor is 25 years compared with 15 years for nurses and 28 years for pharmacists. In this work an estimate of the number of years a social worker uses his or her qualification is provided. It appears that at eight years and 13 years, the expected working life of a social worker and social care worker is shorter than these health care professionals and that gender differences are less apparent. It suggests that there is some evidence of exit to other professions and concludes that further research is needed to identify its extent and some of the underlying reasons why this should be the case.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Curtis, L., Moriarty, J., Netten, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp039</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Expected Working Life of a Social Worker]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp038v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Increasing Care Options in the Countryside: Developing an Understanding of the Potential Impact of Personalization for Social Work with Rural Older People]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp038v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The article examines the possible impact of the personalization of social care services in England on older people living in rural areas and those supporting them in formal and informal roles. It focuses on the development of personal budgets. Interviews were conducted with 33 participants from professional, community and voluntary organizations in 2008. Findings were that the potential flexibility arising from choice and control might be much appreciated by some older people in rural areas; however there were concerns that local variations would affect the capacity to tailor support and to sustain developments. The long-term effects of personalization need to be monitored and assessed to ensure equitable outcomes in rural areas; and, while there may not be significant differences between rural and urban areas, the rural dimensions of adult social care need to be more rigorously explored.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manthorpe, J., Stevens, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-27</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp038</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Increasing Care Options in the Countryside: Developing an Understanding of the Potential Impact of Personalization for Social Work with Rural Older People]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp036v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lost in Translation: How Child Welfare Workers in Norway and England Experience Language Difficulties when Working with Minority Ethnic Families]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp036v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article explores the challenges that social workers in child welfare agencies in Norway and England experience when working with minority ethnic families who are not proficient in the country's language. This study is based on fifty-three interviews in which social workers reflected on an open-ended question that addresses the differences between working with minority ethnic children and their families and white children and their families, provided they believed that there were any differences at all. This study shows that social workers encounter several challenges when using interpreters in their work with minority ethnic families: social workers lose information and they lose time and trust. In addition, the lack of a common language pre-empts the types of interactions that are necessary to establish a good relationship with minority ethnic families. We found that there are hardly any differences between the two countries, even though England has historically had more extensive experience with ethnic minority families and more stringent anti-discrimination laws. The findings also suggest that minority ethnic families may lose out on accurate assessments and access to services due to problems arising from the use of interpreters. We discuss four sets of implications for practice, including strong ethical guidelines for and testing of interpreters, training of social workers in working with interpreters, affirmative strategies on the part of local authorities to eliminate language-related barriers for ethnic minorities and pro-active child welfare systems that address the challenges language differences pose to the child welfare work.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kriz, K., Skivenes, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-27</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp036</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lost in Translation: How Child Welfare Workers in Norway and England Experience Language Difficulties when Working with Minority Ethnic Families]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-03-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp010v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Have Communication Technologies Influenced Rural Social Work Practice?]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp010v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Recent advances in communication technologies have the capacity for addressing many of the challenges identified with rural and remote social work practice, such as scarcity of professional resources, professional isolation and limited access to supervision and professional development. The purpose of this exploratory, qualitative study was to examine how developments in communication technologies have influenced the way social workers practise social work in rural and remote Canadian areas. In-depth interviews were conducted with thirty-seven clinicians. The findings suggested that having access to communication resources, such as the internet, Telehealth and Telepsychiatry, appears to be positively addressing some issues of rural and northern practice. While the role of communication technologies could be further developed as a means of addressing some of the limitations of distance and fewer professional resources in these areas, it simultaneously risks imposing an urban-centric bias upon social work practice in rural and remote communities.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brownlee, K., Graham, J. R., Doucette, E., Hotson, N., Halverson, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-02-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp010</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Have Communication Technologies Influenced Rural Social Work Practice?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-02-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp007v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What Factors Relate to Good Placement Outcomes in Kinship Care?]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp007v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Since recent legislation and other developments are likely to lead to increased use of placements with kin, this paper considers the evidence base about the factors that relate to good outcomes in kinship care in England. It is based on a study using case file reviews on 270 children, half of whom were in kin and half in stranger foster care, and interviews with a sub-sample of thirty-two family and friends carers and a number of social workers, parents and children. The placement outcomes considered were placement quality and disruption. The study found that the kin placements that were most likely to disrupt were those in which children were older at placement, showed difficult behaviour, there was an absence of high carer commitment and contact was not supervised. There were also lower levels of disruption in placements with grandparents and when kin carers had been approved as foster carers and so received financial and practical support. However, poorer quality placements lasted significantly longer in kin than in stranger foster care. Moreover, the outcomes of kin placements turned out to vary widely by local authority. The implications of these findings for policy and practice are considered.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Farmer, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-02-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp007</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What Factors Relate to Good Placement Outcomes in Kinship Care?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-02-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp008v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Comparative Survey of Aotearoa New Zealand and UK Social Workers on the Role of Religion and Spirituality in Practice]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp008v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Increasingly, social work is being challenged to consider the role of spirituality and religion in practice and education as the profession has witnessed an expanding interest in the integration of spirituality, motivated by the recognition of spiritual diversity as an important component of human experience, cultural competency and anti-racist social work practice. In response to the lack of international empirical research in general, and relating to spirituality in particular, cross-national survey research was conducted in Aotearoa New Zealand (ANZ) and the UK as part of a larger multi-national study of social workers' attitudes about the role of spirituality in their practice. Although the two countries share some cultural similarities due to the impact of secularization, British settlement and colonization in ANZ, there are also significant differences related to the unique multicultural make-up of ANZ, emphasizing the indigenous Maori and the centrality of spirituality within a Maori worldview.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stirling, B., Furman, L. D., Benson, P. W., Canda, E. R., Grimwood, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-02-13</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp008</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Comparative Survey of Aotearoa New Zealand and UK Social Workers on the Role of Religion and Spirituality in Practice]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-02-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp009v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Looked After Young People and their Social Work Managers: A Study of Contrasting Experiences of Using Computer-Assisted-Self-Interviewing (A-CASI)]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp009v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Audio-computer-assisted-self-interviewing (A-CASI) is used by many child-care agencies in the UK, as a way of recording the views of children in the care of local authorities. This study considers A-CASI's use in two such local authorities in England. It contrasts how the A-CASI methodology is experienced by children and young people and by child-care managers, and explores how A-CASI may be contributing to the participation of young people in the delivery and management of their care. The study reveals a strong belief in A-CASI from a large number of participants, young people and managers. But managers express concern about many organizational constraints on the effective use of A-CASI data in their agencies. The paper discusses the enthusiasm of the young people for using A-CASI; the concerns of managers; and the opportunities for social workers in using A-CASI in their practice settings.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan, A., Fraser, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-02-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp009</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Looked After Young People and their Social Work Managers: A Study of Contrasting Experiences of Using Computer-Assisted-Self-Interviewing (A-CASI)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp004v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Age of Opportunity? Revisiting Assumptions about the Life-Long Learning Opportunities of Older People Using Social Care Services]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp004v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Shifting national policy in the UK emphasizes choice, independence and social inclusion for older people using social care services through the promotion of healthy, active lifestyles and increasing user involvement (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="BCP004C20">Department of Health, 2006</cross-ref>). Older people are a diverse population. Their definition of a &lsquo;life worth living&rsquo; and support necessary to achieve this are cited as paramount within public policy formation. Simultaneously, older people coming into contact with social work are primarily conceptualized as &lsquo;a challenge&rsquo; within the current social, economic and political environment, in which ageing is perceived as a time of difficulty and loss ultimately leading to increased structured dependency (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="BCP004C60">Townsend, 2006</cross-ref>). This paper makes links between discourses on life-long learning within public policy with those in social care. Both are concerned with increasing participation, citizenship and social justice for older people. It highlights contradictions between aspirations towards life-long learning derived from Freirean approaches seeking to promote &lsquo;active ageing&rsquo; with negative political rhetoric about the burden of ageing and practice of managed care. Social workers play an important part in facilitating learning opportunities within their relationships with older people. Where and how these might be used to promote more inclusive strategies and approaches within practice for the engagement and further emancipation of service users is explored.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hafford-Letchfield, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-02-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp004</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Age of Opportunity? Revisiting Assumptions about the Life-Long Learning Opportunities of Older People Using Social Care Services]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-02-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn164v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Social Work Practice and Lone White Mothers of Mixed-Parentage Children]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn164v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harman, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-02-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn164</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Social Work Practice and Lone White Mothers of Mixed-Parentage Children]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp005v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Integrative Seminar in a Geriatric Consortium]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp005v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Integration of knowledge and skills is a process essential for the education of social work students. This paper describes an integrative seminar designed for students who participate in a consortium, sponsored by the Hartford Partnership Program for Aging Education (HPPAE). The seminar enables students to deepen the relationship between classroom and fieldwork learning. Beyond that, this integration process teaches students leadership skills as they contribute social work values and knowledge to inter-disciplinary teams in their field settings and collaborate with others as they develop professionally.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spira, M., Teigiser, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-02-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp005</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Integrative Seminar in a Geriatric Consortium]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-02-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn163v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Parent Concerns Questionnaire: A Reliable and Valid Common Assessment Framework for Child and Family Social Care]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn163v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A major government inspired effort to improve standardisation of practice has, in recent years led to the development of key instruments to guide assessment and intervention in child and family social care. This has occurred against a background of the development of an increased policy emphasis on prevention, appropriate responses to need, information exchange, and evidence based practice. The Common Assessment Framework (CAF) has been developed for widespread use by various practitioners/professionals in relation to work with children and families with &lsquo;additional needs&rsquo; but below the level of child protection. However amongst the criticisms of CAF is that it has no demonstrated reliability and validity. The Parent Concerns Questionnaire (PCQ) has been developed in research on child and family social care. It is an instrument generically applicable to this area, and consistent with the framework used in CAF and the <I>Common Assessment Framework</I>. This article reports on extensive tests of reliability and validity of PCQ. The PCQ is shown to have face, concurrent and construct validity, and internal and test-retest reliability in child and family social care populations. The implications of this, and potential use, for practice are discussed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheppard, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-02-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn163</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Parent Concerns Questionnaire: A Reliable and Valid Common Assessment Framework for Child and Family Social Care]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-02-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp003v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bullying of Social Workers: Outcomes of a Grounded Study into Impacts and Interventions]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp003v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Workplace bullying has become recognized as a costly workplace problem that may be relatively common in the human services. However, the topic remains underexplored with respect to social workers. In the absence of discipline-specific information, relying on data derived from research with other professions can lead to untested assumptions about causes and about appropriate interventions. A qualitative study was undertaken with seventeen social workers who reported that they had been bullied in the workplace. Whilst participants had experienced significant distress and reported at least a temporary decline in work-related confidence, most considered themselves wiser as a result of their experiences and did not perceive a lasting diminishment of their professional opportunities. There were, however, exceptions to this positive outcome and these appeared to be related to discrimination against participants with minority group status. Grounded analysis led to explanatory theories that locate bullying in the context of stressful changing workplaces in which professional people experience status uncertainty, and compete for job control and respect. Conversely, prevention and intervention require the adoption of health-promoting organizational policies that foster supportive working environments and relationships.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van Heugten, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-02-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp003</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bullying of Social Workers: Outcomes of a Grounded Study into Impacts and Interventions]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-02-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp001v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Social Workers Serving Poor Clients: Perceptions of Poverty and Service Policy]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp001v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This qualitative study extends current research on social workers' perceptions of poverty and the views of their roles by investigating how these perceptions are manifested in actions. How are the perceptions of poverty, poor clients, and the roles and the responsibilities of social work directors of council social services in Israel reflected in their definition and implementation of the services&rsquo; poverty related policy, i.e., the services they offer the poor and the services they recommend creating for the poor, within the cultural and situational context of people living in poverty in Israel. A focus group with eleven directors and in-depth interviews with six directors were conducted. The study shows that poverty perceptions are reflected in service policy. Directors were unsure of their professional role and responsibilities with regard to poverty, preferred intervention at the individual or family level over policy-practice, did not perceive the poor as a target population, did not direct their efforts at the poor, and consequently did not develop poor client centred services.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monnickendam, M., Katz, Ch., Monnickendam, M. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp001</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Social Workers Serving Poor Clients: Perceptions of Poverty and Service Policy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn176v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['If We Don't Get Back to Where We Were Before': Working in the Restructured Non-Profit Social Services]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn176v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Drawing on data collected as part of a larger study of the experience of restructuring in the nonprofit (voluntary) social services in Canada and Australia, this article explores the responses to four overlapping interview questions regarding what drew nonprofit social service workers to the sector, what were the positive and negative aspects of working in the sector, and, if given the power, what is the one thing they would change. Responses to these questions highlight the way social service workers wish they could work, factors that impede this work, decrease worker autonomy and increase management control over their labour process. These new findings will be compared to findings from an earlier study of restructuring in the public and nonprofit Canadian social services, highlighting the way that changes in the labour process suppress or facilitate the empowerment of workers, including their capacity to dream of a better future.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baines, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn176</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA['If We Don't Get Back to Where We Were Before': Working in the Restructured Non-Profit Social Services]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp002v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Managing Restructured Social Services: Expanding the Social?]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcp002v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper reports the early findings of a qualitative, longitudinal study of women managing health and social services in southern Ontario&mdash;a context that has been subject to successive rounds of restructuring and managerial reforms. Study participants, all women with extensive practice backgrounds and long-standing commitments to progressive public services, were critical of yet deeply implicated in organizational practices they judged at odds with the interests of clients and communities. The findings reveal how they negotiate this complex positioning within and against the logic of managerialism to find ways to insert social justice agendas. Even as managerial imperatives pressed them to subordinate these agendas, they found ways to extend the reach of their programmes to those increasingly excluded from receipt of public support and to politicize and expand the scope of their organizations' work. By naming such practices and strategies&mdash;often experienced in isolation and as somewhat improvised and formless&mdash;the study seeks to contribute to the critical literature on social service management. Participants' experiences open up important questions about both the strains and the opportunities in managers' positioning that will be the focus of ongoing data-gathering and analysis.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aronson, J., Smith, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-27</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp002</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Managing Restructured Social Services: Expanding the Social?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn146v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Managers' and Staff Experiences of Adult Protection Allegations in Mental Health and Learning Disability Residential Services: A Qualitative Study]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn146v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Adult protection policy slowly developed in England and Wales during the 1990s. In the same decade specialist residential services expanded for people with mental health problems and with learning disabilities, some of which were secure or semi-secure in status. Many referrals to adult protection systems emanate from this sector but few result in conclusive outcomes. This article reports on and considers adult protection workings in these settings. Data from interviews with 13 residential unit managers and 10 care workers, who were suspended following an allegation but later exonerated, are presented. Perceptions of the development of adult protection practice, policy and legislation were that these have generally led to positive outcomes. However, these data reveal other outcomes including service disruption, stress for residents, staff and managers. Service managers commented particularly on how the application of policy and practice enhances but also upsets the services they provide. Multi-agency collaboration, transparency of practice, training, reflective practice, and effective supervision of frontline staff, appeared to assist managers and care workers in negotiating the positive and negative experiences of the implementation of adult protection systems.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rees, P., Manthorpe, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn146</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Managers' and Staff Experiences of Adult Protection Allegations in Mental Health and Learning Disability Residential Services: A Qualitative Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn165v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Social Work Doctoral Students in the UK: A Web-Based Survey and Search of the Index to Theses]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn165v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Despite traditionally having low numbers of doctoral students, social work research is currently undergoing expansion at doctoral level. Professional doctorates are starting up, which are highly applied to practice and include modules as well as a thesis, and the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) has now recognized social work as a separate discipline for doctoral training. The aims of this research project were to identify who these social work doctoral students are, what they are researching and what their experience is of doctoral study. Quantitative and qualitative data were generated via a web-based survey of social work doctoral students across the UK&mdash;those on professional doctorates as well as Ph.D.s and those engaged in full-time and part-time study. The data were subject to bivariate analysis. There was also a search conducted of the Index to Theses for doctoral theses on social work topics over a ten-year period. Findings from both elements of the research are presented in relation to student demographics, employment and funding, type of doctorate, methodology and student satisfaction.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scourfield, J., Maxwell, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn165</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Social Work Doctoral Students in the UK: A Web-Based Survey and Search of the Index to Theses]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn178v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['My Expectations Remain the Same. The Student Has to Be Competent to Practise': Practice Assessor Perspectives on the New Social Work Degree Qualification in England]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn178v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Research has emphasized the importance of practice learning to social work qualifying education but has tended to feature social work educator and student perspectives more strongly than the views of those responsible for assessing students' practice in the field. This article draws on 195 responses to a postal questionnaire sent at two points in time to practice assessors working with students from nine social work qualifying programmes run in six higher education institutions collected as part of the evaluation of the new social work degree qualification in England. While practice assessors described changes in their role and in the opportunities available to students, they also emphasized continuities, particularly in the skills that they expected students to possess. The key difficulty they identified was the heavy workload resulting from combining their role as practice assessors with their other responsibilities at work. Increases in the number of social work students and changes to the organization of services are likely to create further pressures on practice assessors. Given that these issues are faced by a number of different professions, the article concludes that there is potential for future studies to look at the experiences of practice educators across different professional qualifying programmes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moriarty, J., MacIntyre, G., Manthorpe, J., Crisp, B. R., Orme, J., Lister, P. G., Cavanagh, K., Stevens, M., Hussein, S., Sharpe, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn178</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA['My Expectations Remain the Same. The Student Has to Be Competent to Practise': Practice Assessor Perspectives on the New Social Work Degree Qualification in England]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn177v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of a Healthy Families America (HFA) Programme: A Deeper Understanding]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn177v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of a Healthy Families America (HFA) programme in meeting its goals and better understand the role of therapeutic alliance. Methods: One hundred and sixty-three families and their Family Support Worker (FSW) enrolled in an HFA programme completed five sets of measures over a five-year time frame. Results: Descriptive statistics provide a socio-demographic and programme involvement profile. Families demonstrated positive health and child development-related outcomes. Families improved in their ability to provide a positive home environment; children successfully met developmental milestones; and FSWs were highly effective in engaging families and creating a working alliance. Conclusions: Programme strengths and weaknesses are discussed within an international context with implications for future research in this area.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Whipple, E. E., Whyte, J. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn177</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of a Healthy Families America (HFA) Programme: A Deeper Understanding]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn162v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Performing 'Initial Assessment': Identifying the Latent Conditions for Error at the Front-Door of Local Authority Children's Services]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn162v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article draws attention to the faulty design elements at the front-door of children's local authority services, arguing that current attempts to increase safety, through the formalization of organizational procedures and their enactment by IT systems, may have had the contrary effect. We argue that the analysis of errors in organizational settings should focus on immanent <I>systemic</I> weaknesses, particularly the &lsquo;latent conditions&rsquo; for error that generally increase the risk of failure. Reporting the findings from a two-year ESRC-funded ethnographic study, and examining the local adaptations of practice arising in the performance context of the &lsquo;modernized&rsquo; front-door of children's services, we draw attention to the short-cuts that the current configuration of the initial assessment system appears to necessitate, given the immutable timescales and excessive audit requirements. New modes of governance can clearly play a central role in error management, but the design of an effective system needs to be based on the needs of users and on a thorough understanding of their working practices.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Broadhurst, K., Wastell, D., White, S., Hall, C., Peckover, S., Thompson, K., Pithouse, A., Davey, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn162</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Performing 'Initial Assessment': Identifying the Latent Conditions for Error at the Front-Door of Local Authority Children's Services]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-01-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn160v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[No Recourse, No Support: State Policy and Practice towards South Asian Women Facing Domestic Violence in the UK]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn160v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper examines the extent to which government policy and practice meet the needs of women with insecure immigration status who are experiencing domestic violence. The research on which this paper is based was conducted between January and June 2007 and included qualitative interviews with thirty South Asian women who were barred from receiving public funds (known as &lsquo;no recourse to public funds&rsquo; (NRPF)) due to their status as recent marriage migrants, who were living in the North West and Yorkshire regions of England. This paper examines the complex legislation that governs the entitlement of women with NRPF who are facing domestic violence, women's experiences of social service practice, its impact on the safety and welfare of the women and their children, and suggests a way forward.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anitha, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-12-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn160</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[No Recourse, No Support: State Policy and Practice towards South Asian Women Facing Domestic Violence in the UK]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-12-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn149v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[When Things Go Wrong! Placement Disruption and Termination: Power and Student Perspectives]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn149v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Practice learning, or field education, represents a key component of qualifying social work education in many countries and disruption or potential failure can have profound implications for all involved. It is perhaps surprising, given its centrality, that there is so little research or theorizing undertaken into the termination of placements from any perspective. This paper examines what is known about disrupted, marginal or failing placements in social work programmes and seeks to examine and theorize the perceptions and experiences of students in England who have been through the process, exploring power issues and imbalances. The study on which this paper is based sought to develop and enhance future responses to placement disruption from all stakeholders in practice learning.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parker, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn149</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[When Things Go Wrong! Placement Disruption and Termination: Power and Student Perspectives]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn148v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Social Work Students: Stress, Support and Well-Being]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn148v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This appears to be the first piece of research in the UK to focus exclusively on stress, support and well-being of social work students. The findings of a postal questionnaire indicated no statistically significant differences related to gender, age, year of study or family commitments. Social work students enjoyed a high sense of personal accomplishment. They enjoyed their work with users. Students undertaking part-time work were subject to significantly more demands than other students. Important support was obtained from fellow students, course tutors and practice teachers, but significant numbers of students experienced problems with low self-esteem and emotional exhaustion. They would probably benefit from additional opportunities for mutual group support, individual tutorial support and stress management courses. Wider structural issues include the need for more adequate funding for students to reduce the need to undertake part-time employment. Findings from this study encourage a focus on intervention at different levels to reduce stress with individual students, groups of students, practice teachers, course staff and the institutional environment.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Collins, S., Coffey, M., Morris, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn148</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Social Work Students: Stress, Support and Well-Being]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn143v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['A Friend and an Equal': Do Young People in Care Seek the Impossible from their Social Workers?]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn143v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Recent policy initiatives have begun to recognize something that has long been indicated by research findings and by studies of young people's views: that, for children in local authority care, having a positive and sustained personal relationship with their social worker promotes their well-being. This article presents findings from a research study in which the views of young people in care were elicited on the role of the social worker. Their response, that a good social worker is like a &lsquo;friend&rsquo; and an &lsquo;equal&rsquo;, appears to challenge notions of the professional social work role. However, attention to the detail of what the young people meant by these terms demonstrates that, in fact, they are compatible with social work values and best practice. It is argued that, in order to accord with these young people's wishes and with research findings on what promotes best outcomes for looked after young people, social workers must be enabled to give more time to sustained direct work with children in care. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McLeod, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn143</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA['A Friend and an Equal': Do Young People in Care Seek the Impossible from their Social Workers?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn147v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Emerging Social Pedagogical Paradigm in UK Child and Youth Care: Deus Ex Machina or Walking the Beaten Path?]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn147v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article is prompted by the finding that social pedagogy&mdash;although not a familiar concept in the UK&mdash;is now being taken up with greater interest (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="BCN147C62">Petrie <I>et al.</I>, 2006</cross-ref>; <cross-ref type="bib" refid="BCN147C54">Lorenz, 2008</cross-ref>), especially in the field of early childhood education and residential child and youth care. Social pedagogy is believed to be able to promote shared values and skills across different fields in education and care that were, until recently, sharply distinguished from each other (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="BCN147C61">Petrie, 2005</cross-ref>). In this article, we reflect on the recent developments in the import of social pedagogy into the UK. Next, we comment on the assumed potential of the concept of social pedagogy. In connection with these comments, we make a plea for explicit recognition of &lsquo;the social&rsquo; in social pedagogy. We endorse the historical reflections on German social pedagogy made by <cross-ref type="bib" refid="BCN147C54">Lorenz (2008)</cross-ref> and will add some considerations driven by our involvement with the development of social pedagogy in the UK. In the final discussion, we highlight the potential of social pedagogy as a perspective on social work (cf. <cross-ref type="bib" refid="BCN147C38">H&auml;m&auml;l&auml;inen, 2003</cross-ref>).</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coussee, F., Bradt, L., Roose, R., Bouverne-De Bie, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn147</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Emerging Social Pedagogical Paradigm in UK Child and Youth Care: Deus Ex Machina or Walking the Beaten Path?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn144v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Striving towards Inclusive Research: An Example of Participatory Action Research with Older Lesbians and Gay Men]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn144v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper sets out to explore the implications of participatory action research (PAR) as a method of encouraging older people from minority groups to have a &lsquo;voice&rsquo; in defining knowledge, theory and practice about their lives. Recent policy in Britain has promoted the recognition of diversity of experience in later life (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="BCN144C45">Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, 2006</cross-ref>) and the importance of working with older people as equal partners (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="BCN144C2">Audit Commission, 2004</cross-ref>). At the same time, notions of partnership and service user involvement in both research and practice development are now firmly established within health and social care practice. Despite this, the needs of older lesbians and gay men are still very much invisible within mainstream policy and practice (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="BCN144C30">Heaphy <I>et al.</I>, 2004</cross-ref>). PAR approaches seek to address issues of power, politics and empowerment (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="BCN144C5">Bradbury and Reason, 2001</cross-ref>) and therefore offers an inclusive method of working with marginalized and excluded voices. This is important in research with minority groups, as their experiences can be masked by imposing mainstream categories and assumptions (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="BCN144C46">Pollner and Rosenfeld, 2000</cross-ref>). The paper considers participatory action research as a methodology for inclusive social work research and uses a case study to explore the methodology. It reviews the &lsquo;cycle&rsquo; of research using the six principles for working with disempowered groups identified by <cross-ref type="bib" refid="BCN144C60">Whitmore and McGee (2001)</cross-ref>. The paradoxes involved in participatory research are explored, including issues of inclusiveness and exclusivity, and the possibility of &lsquo;untold truths&rsquo; (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="BCN144C40">Lundy and McGovern, 2006</cross-ref>). The challenges involved in striving for inclusive and empowering research methodologies are discussed, exploring the implications for &lsquo;outsider&rsquo; researchers, and the challenges of working with &lsquo;variant truths&rsquo;.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fenge, L.-A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn144</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Striving towards Inclusive Research: An Example of Participatory Action Research with Older Lesbians and Gay Men]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn139v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Professional Doctorate Programmes in Social Work: The Current State of Provision in the UK]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn139v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The paper presents the findings of a survey of UK professional doctorate programmes that have a social work element. The aim was to provide an initial description of the extent and nature of current provision. The survey was conducted via academic community e-mail lists and followed up with telephone interviews. Findings are presented about the universities offering programmes, longevity of programmes, numbers of students, students' employment and employer support, degree nomenclature, programme structure, successful aspects of programmes and their approach to handling the relationship between research and practice. Some tentative conclusions are presented about the possible ways forward for social work professional doctorates and avenues for further research about these degrees.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scourfield, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn139</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Professional Doctorate Programmes in Social Work: The Current State of Provision in the UK]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn142v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Place Matters: The Significance of Place Attachments for Children's Well-Being]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn142v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Whilst the social work literature rightly pays considerable attention to the importance for children's development and well-being of their attachments to <I>people</I>, there has been virtually no consideration of the role which is also played by their attachments to <I>place</I>. Drawing on research from fields such as human geography and environmental psychology, the significance of children's place attachments for the development of their identity, security and sense of belonging is examined. Evidene is also presented about the &lsquo;shrinking world of childhood&rsquo;, in which children's independent access to their surroundings is becoming ever more restricted as a result of parental fears, and the implications of this trend for the development of children's place attachments. Government policy relevant to these issues, including strategies designed to develop more &lsquo;child-friendly communities&rsquo;, is critically reviewed, together with evidence-based practice recommendations designed to improve the well-being of looked after children by promoting their place attachments.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn142</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Place Matters: The Significance of Place Attachments for Children's Well-Being]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn141v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Going for Brokerage: A Task of 'Independent Support' or Social Work?]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn141v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>It is argued that for the agenda to &lsquo;personalize&rsquo; social care in the UK to be successful, adequate systems of support brokerage need to be in place. Where brokerage is situated organizationally and ideologically is not inconsequential, both in terms of the accountability, profile and quality of the &lsquo;brokers&rsquo; and the extent to which service users can feel properly in control of their own care or support. Many involved in support brokerage argue that independence from statutory bodies is a key principle. However, models of support brokerage have been suggested that propose brokerage as a possible function of the statutory social care sector. The paper traces how and why the &lsquo;new&rsquo; language of brokerage has emerged in official discourses of adult social care. It also discusses the various ideas about what brokerage is and who is supposed to undertake it. It is considered whether support brokerage should be regarded as a form of social work, which is not currently the case. Were independent support brokerage to expand its role in the adult social care system, the question would arise of where that would leave social work with adults. These developments expose conflicts and tensions in New Labour's modernization agenda.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scourfield, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn141</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Going for Brokerage: A Task of 'Independent Support' or Social Work?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn140v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Social Work and Disabled Children's Childhoods: A Foucauldian Framework for Practice Transformation]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn140v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper examines how social work operates as a system of exclusion and inclusion and influences disabled children's childhoods. It is based on an action research project that aimed to promote &lsquo;listening&rsquo; to disabled children in social work. A Foucauldian framework is applied to deconstruct discourses, analyse their use in practice and form a cycle of practice transformation. Three stories are presented from the action research project to illustrate how practitioners' conditions, discourses of childhood and disability and ethical statements limit or enhance disabled children's opportunities. The cycle of practice transformation is developed from analysis of the project and Foucault's approach to &lsquo;ethical practices&rsquo;. This suggests a different purpose for welfare in which service provision aimed to liberate, protect and meet the needs of disabled children is not enough. The cycle aims to generate more &lsquo;desirable&rsquo; forms of subjectivity that are enjoyed by disabled children. The Foucauldian framework provides an ethical basis for dialogue with members of organizations of disabled people that, it is argued, is especially relevant to transformation of relations of vulnerability and the involvement of others in disabled children's childhoods.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Curran, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn140</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Social Work and Disabled Children's Childhoods: A Foucauldian Framework for Practice Transformation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn137v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Working with Alcohol and Drug Use: Exploring the Knowledge and Attitudes of Social Work Students]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn137v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Many social workers in the UK work daily with the social harms linked to problematic substance use. Historically, however, their drug and alcohol training needs have been overlooked. This study set out to achieve two key objectives: (i) to assess social work students' knowledge of, and attitudes towards, working with people with substance problems; and (ii) to develop and test a questionnaire to meet this objective. A four-part self-completion questionnaire was developed and administered to a purposive sample of 156 social work students. The focus of this article will be on the results of Part 2 of the pilot survey, which focused on the students' attitudes towards, and knowledge of, substance use. One hundred and twenty-one completed questionnaires were used as the basis for analysis. Three factors emerged as the key explanatory factors demonstrating significant relationships between them: &lsquo;knowledge&rsquo;, &lsquo;support from colleagues&rsquo; and &lsquo;legitimacy of role&rsquo;. Social work training needs to recognize the need for alcohol and drug education within social work qualifying programmes in order that future social workers will feel equipped with the knowledge and legitimacy to do their job and meet the needs of people who have problems with alcohol and drugs.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Galvani, S., Hughes, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn137</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Working with Alcohol and Drug Use: Exploring the Knowledge and Attitudes of Social Work Students]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn133v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Deadlocked Dialogues in Child Welfare]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn133v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In the interactions with families, child welfare workers investigate the parental capability to guarantee their children's safe and prosperous development. A main strategy of child welfare workers is to encourage parental reflection, which may help parents to consider the family problems from a more remote position. Findings from a two-fold case study show that the conversational mode of professionals and clients are crucial to bring about this reflective position. Both the professionals' abstract and layered approach and the legal context of family intervention may restrain clients to take a reflective position and to better see the nature of their problems and the ways to solve them.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van Nijnatten, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn133</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Deadlocked Dialogues in Child Welfare]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn136v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Social Worker versus the General Social Care Council: An Analysis of Care Standards Tribunal Hearings and Decisions]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn136v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The General Social Care Council (GSCC) is the regulatory body for the social care workforce in England.<sup><cross-ref type="fn" refid="FN1">1</cross-ref></sup> It maintains the Social Care Register and has the power to refuse an applicant entry onto the Register and to instigate proceedings to have those on the Register removed if they deem the social worker in question has committed misconduct. As it is a criminal offence for anyone whose name is not on the Register to call themselves a social worker, the GSCC has extensive powers in relation to the social care workforce. This paper analyses cases in which social workers have been through the GSCC's regulatory process, disagree with the decision and have exercised their right to appeal to the Care Standards Tribunal. Using a critical content analysis, several themes are identified that give cause for concern about the workings of the GSCC, its Committees and the Care Standards Tribunal itself. It is noted that there is an inherent imbalance of power in the proceedings, which heavily favour the GSCC and are detrimental to the social worker's chance of receiving a fair hearing. In addition, areas in which social workers' &lsquo;out of work&rsquo; lives have been considered to be within the remit of GSCC investigation and censure are highlighted. It is pointed out that a new morality of appropriate behaviour is being overseen by a government-appointed organization. The findings and areas of concern identified are of particular concern to social workers and social care professionals who find themselves increasingly subject to surveillance and censure by the GSCC. The conclusion considers some key points that require further discussion within social work and indeed the wider political realm.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McLaughlin, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-04</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn136</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Social Worker versus the General Social Care Council: An Analysis of Care Standards Tribunal Hearings and Decisions]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn135v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Making Decisions about Who Should Be Barred from Working with Adults in Vulnerable Situations: The Need for Social Work Understanding]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn135v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article reports on an element of recently completed research that aimed to explore factors leading to placement on the Protection of Vulnerable Adults (POVA) List&mdash;a barring list unique to England and Wales. A multiple methods approach was adopted, involving in-depth quantitative analysis of POVA referral records and a set of discussion groups and interviews investigating how decisions were being made. This article focuses on this latter element, setting out and discussing the overall schema for decision making resulting from the analysis, which identified an interplay between emotional and moral responses to the individual referred and evidence about the alleged misconduct. The importance of involving all stakeholders in the development of such a decision-making system is raised through the research and the implications for social workers are explored.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stevens, M., Manthorpe, J., Martineau, S., Hussein, S., Rapaport, J., Harris, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn135</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Making Decisions about Who Should Be Barred from Working with Adults in Vulnerable Situations: The Need for Social Work Understanding]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn130v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Men Who Were Sexually Abused in Childhood and Subsequent Suicidal Ideation: Community Comparison, Explanations and Practice Implications]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn130v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In the Western world, men are particularly vulnerable to suicide, so it is important to undertake research that helps explain the manifestation of suicidality. This is one of the few studies to date that have researched men who were sexually abused in childhood and their presentation of suicidal ideation, much of the previous research with this focus having been restricted to women. The study draws on a clinical sample of 147 Australian men who were sexually abused in childhood, of whom thirty-nine also gave open-ended interviews, and comparisons are made with a community sample of 1,231 men. It was found that the sexually abused men were up to ten times more likely to report suicidal ideation than the controls. To understand risk factors for suicidal ideation, a predictive regression model was constructed, the most important variables in this model being self-blame, isolation and physical injuries sustained from the abuse. These variables are further explored and illuminated from the qualitative data. Key implications of the study for social work practice include the need for screening and assessment of men in clinical populations as well as in other vulnerable populations. Limitations of the study and future areas of inquiry are also outlined.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[O'Leary, P., Gould, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn130</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Men Who Were Sexually Abused in Childhood and Subsequent Suicidal Ideation: Community Comparison, Explanations and Practice Implications]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn134v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Workplace Violence towards Social Workers: The Australian Experience]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn134v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Workplace violence is common in health-related occupations that involve substantial contact with clients, such as nursing, general practice, pre-hospital care and emergency medicine. Research has also been conducted that explores violence in social work; however, the majority has emerged from the UK and USA, and is limited due to definitional shortcomings and the scope of violence. In Australia, there is a paucity of research that has explored the prevalence of violence in social work. Thus, the aim of the research was to determine the prevalence of six forms of workplace violence, and determine factors that may predict the occurrence of violence towards social workers. A questionnaire was developed that focused on social workers' experiences of six forms of violence (verbal abuse, property damage/theft, intimidation, physical abuse, sexual harassment and sexual assault). The questionnaire was randomly distributed to 1,000 social workers across Australia. Participation was voluntary and social workers completed the questionnaire anonymously. Analyses revealed that the majority of social workers (67 per cent) had experienced at least one form of violence in the past twelve months. The most common form of violence was verbal abuse followed by intimidation, and sexual assault was the least common form of violence experienced. Factors that predicted violence emerged for all six forms of violence examined. Based on the results of this research, it can be concluded that workplace violence is common in social work, particularly verbal abuse and intimidation. Factors that predict violence can be used to develop interventions aimed at preventing and managing workplace violence.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Koritsas, S., Coles, J., Boyle, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn134</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Workplace Violence towards Social Workers: The Australian Experience]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn132v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Beyond Homo Economicus: Recognition, Self-Realization and Social Work]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn132v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper builds on Ferguson's important contribution to the debate on personalization in social work that appeared in the <I>British Journal of Social Work</I> in 2007. Whereas Ferguson approached the topic through the lens of political philosophy, the account below draws on critical social theory to examine not only the nature of personalization, but also its supportive pillar of individualization. In particular, Axel Honneth's critique of individualization in modern society is presented before setting out his ideas on the need for self-realization through inter-subjective recognition. The implications of Honneth's position are then considered in terms of four interrelated dimensions of social work practice, namely: (i) social work as symbolic interaction; (ii) social work as care; (iii) social work as respect; and (iv) social work as validation. It is argued that this constellation of practices poses a direct and necessary challenge to a social work of personalization.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Houston, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn132</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Beyond Homo Economicus: Recognition, Self-Realization and Social Work]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn115v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Conceptualizing Young People's Strategies of Resistance to Offending as 'Active Resilience']]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn115v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper draws on the Quest for Identity study, which comprised secondary analysis of interviews with young people who have never offended (&lsquo;resisters&rsquo;) and young people who have offended, then ceased (&lsquo;desisters&rsquo;), as well as peer led focus groups with resisters. However, the paper focuses solely on the semi-structured interviews with 62 young resisters and addresses the research question as to how they maintain their resistance to offending. Contrary to the passivity associated with non-offending, it is argued that in maintaining their resistance to offending young resisters engage in what I term &lsquo;active resilience&rsquo;. This is exemplified by a range of strategies employed by resisters, which includes: managing offending peers, taking temporal leaps, &lsquo;othering&rsquo; offenders and telling atrocity stories. The concept of active resilience resonates with the key theoretical perspective associated with the social studies of childhood, which characterises young people as agentic social actors, and also with the resilience literature, with its recent perceptible shift towards acknowledging young people's contribution to their own resilience. The paper concludes with the implications of the findings for policy, practice and future research.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murray, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn115</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Conceptualizing Young People's Strategies of Resistance to Offending as 'Active Resilience']]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn131v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[People in Places: A Qualitative Exploration of Recruitment Agencies' Perspectives on the Employment of International Social Workers in the UK]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn131v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Social work and social care vacancies in England have partly been filled by international labour migration. Some staff are recruited from their home countries; others are recruited post arrival in the UK. The business of recruitment is often undertaken by commercial employment agencies; however, there is little literature on the workings of this sector. This article reports the first phase of a study of international recruitment in social care in England. It outlines the findings of a scoping review of the literature and of semi-structured interviews with a convenience sample of twenty recruitment agencies undertaken in 2007&ndash;08. The interviews revealed new information on employers' reported needs and preferences, on changing profiles of people seeking work in England, and staff motivations and ambitions. This article concludes that social care migration is a multifaceted phenomenon and that the position of intermediaries in the employment relationship, such as recruitment agencies, is largely but mistakenly ignored.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hussein, S., Manthorpe, J., Stevens, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn131</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[People in Places: A Qualitative Exploration of Recruitment Agencies' Perspectives on the Employment of International Social Workers in the UK]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn129v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Social Work and the 'War on Terror']]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn129v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The terrorist attacks on the New York World Trade Centre and disturbances in Northern England in 2001, together with subsequent terrorist attacks in London in July 2005, have created in the public mind a concern about the direct threat posed to the safety of individuals and society. The government's response has been to mount a wholesale attack on terrorism and to wage a &lsquo;war on terror&rsquo; whilst, at the same time, attempting to produce a cohesive society with a shared sense of belonging. Social work literature and practice have neglected these issues. The purpose of this paper is not to rehearse the causes of these events and responses, but to explore their relevance to social work and their implications for practice through a revival of more politically orientated radical and critical social work approaches.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guru, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-22</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn129</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Social Work and the 'War on Terror']]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn121v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is Social Exclusion a Useful Concept in Children's Services?]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn121v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The concept of social exclusion has a high profile in children's services in the UK. But how does a focus on exclusion change the way in which services seek to define vulnerable children and help them? In particular, how does it compare with (i) a risk and protective factor model and associated attempts to meet need and (ii) efforts to tackle poverty? This article examines the influence of the concept on policy and practice by considering seven emphases commonly associated with a social exclusion perspective. It argues that the concept offers helpful insights into child well-being and the shape of children's services but that these could be exploited more fully, and that many of its perceived benefits in terms of service orientation actually sit well if not better within existing conceptual frameworks.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Axford, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn121</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is Social Exclusion a Useful Concept in Children's Services?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn118v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Towards Integrated Participation: Involving Seldom Heard Users of Social Care Services]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn118v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Using information from interviews with forty-one service users and thirty-two staff from eight organizations, a practice model is developed to show how those typically excluded from user participation be included into everyday participation to develop services and policies. The practice model outlines the processes necessary to promote and institutionally embed participation. The uncertainties and tensions that arise from these activities are also discussed. The value of the findings presented in this paper is that they provide information about how service user participation may be achieved.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hernandez, L., Robson, P., Sampson, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn118</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Towards Integrated Participation: Involving Seldom Heard Users of Social Care Services]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn119v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Squeezing the Toothpaste Tube: Will Tackling Court Delay Result in Pre-Court Delay in its Place?]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn119v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article is the first to report on a study that tracked all the care proceedings initiated by an English local authority over a one-year period, obtaining factual information and opinions from the social workers involved in the case through the use of guided interviews. The main objective of the researchers was to contribute to understanding of ways in which children are kept waiting in difficult and insecure situations for decisions to be made about their long-term future. This article focuses in particular on the problem of delays that occur <I>prior</I> to a case coming into the court arena. The article offers evidence that current initiatives to reduce court delay may have the unintended result of increasing pre-court delay.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McKeigue, B., Beckett, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-04</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn119</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Squeezing the Toothpaste Tube: Will Tackling Court Delay Result in Pre-Court Delay in its Place?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn117v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Views of Children and Young People on Being Cared For by an Independent Foster-Care Provider]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn117v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper reports some of the findings from a study (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="BCN117C10">Farmer <I>et al.</I>, 2007</cross-ref>) commissioned by an independent foster-care provider, Foster Care Associates, to examine the progress and outcomes of children in their care over a one-year period. This is the first published study to ask children and young people placed with an independent fostering provider (IFP) about their views on the care they have received. While most children and young people were very positive about their placements and the support and activities provided for them, the research also raised questions about the stability of placements within the IFP sector and the promotion of children's friendships.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Selwyn, J., Saunders, H., Farmer, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-27</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn117</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Views of Children and Young People on Being Cared For by an Independent Foster-Care Provider]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn116v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessing the Influence of Religious Beliefs and Practices on Parenting Capacity: The Challenges for Social Work Practitioners]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn116v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The 1989 Children Act emphasizes the importance of giving due consideration to the child's religious persuasion. Yet, government assessment guidance provides practitioners with very little assistance in terms of establishing ways in which religious beliefs and practices influence family life. This is concerning at a time when considerable attention is being paid in the media to the negative influences of religious beliefs on parenting and Britain is becoming increasingly diverse. Drawing on a literature review of seventy-seven papers on religion and parenting, consideration is given to some of the challenges encountered by social workers when assessing the influence of religious beliefs on parenting. These challenges include: a lack of clarity with regard to what is meant by &lsquo;religion&rsquo;; small-scale research studies with limited scope; a focus on perceptions of the influence of religious beliefs; disregard for both social workers' own views about religion and the ways in which these views are likely to influence practice. Moreover, poor preparation on social work training programmes and minimal support from supervisors mean that practitioners do not feel confident exploring religious beliefs and practices with families. All these factors lead to a significant influence in many families' lives being ignored.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Horwath, J., Lees, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-27</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn116</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessing the Influence of Religious Beliefs and Practices on Parenting Capacity: The Challenges for Social Work Practitioners]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn081v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Teaching Social Workers to Harness Technology and Inter-Disciplinary Collaboration for Community Service]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn081v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Relatively little has been written encouraging social workers to use communication technologies for community service purposes, such as education and advocacy with general populations, and empowerment of individuals, groups and communities, especially marginalized and voiceless populations traditionally served by social workers, to tell their own stories using these media. This paper reviews relevant literature on the use of media in social work, presents examples of ways visual technologies have been used to serve populations-at-risk, and briefly describes a course jointly offered by a school of social work and a school of the arts intended to teach students the use of various technologies for community service purposes. The application of social work practice, theory, research and policy to media production reflects a little-explored potential modality for micro and macro intervention, and thus is an innovation in the field, combining service learning, inter-disciplinary collaboration and application of social work knowledge through technology. We also argue that social workers should become competent in using media to harness their power for intervention with and on behalf of clients, and to positively and actively shape the way clients and our profession are portrayed and viewed in the larger world.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosenthal Gelman, C., Tosone, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-27</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn081</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Teaching Social Workers to Harness Technology and Inter-Disciplinary Collaboration for Community Service]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn102v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Caring as a Moral, Practical and Powerful Endeavour: Peer Care in a Cambodian Orphanage]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn102v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Research on children's participation in domestic life has tended to focus on the experiences of those living within families. This article reports on a pilot project, undertaken in one Cambodian orphanage, which focused on the care that children provided to themselves and to one another. It argues that not only were such care practices manifest, but they were understood by children to contribute to their power and status within the orphanage as well as the construction of their individual moral self-identities. The boundaries of relationships between children were defined and redefined through care-related actions.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emond, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn102</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Caring as a Moral, Practical and Powerful Endeavour: Peer Care in a Cambodian Orphanage]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn103v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Conducting Needs Assessments in Children's Services]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn103v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Recent years have witnessed a revival in the popularity of measuring need in developing and developed countries as a precursor to distributing health, education, housing, social security and social care resources. The concept of needs-led children's services has particular purchase in England and Wales, where there is a legal requirement for local authorities to identify and assist &lsquo;children in need&rsquo;. Yet, children's services agencies have consistently struggled to do this meaningfully and efficiently. This article analyses the strengths and weaknesses of needs assessments in the field before discussing new methods that are appearing. The final section considers how to encourage children's services to shift resources into the new methods.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Axford, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn103</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Conducting Needs Assessments in Children's Services]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn114v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Building and Sustaining Local Co-ordination: An Australian Rural Community Responds to Domestic and Family Violence]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn114v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The aim of this paper is to share a story about how a rural community in South Australia strived to work more collaboratively and effectively to respond to domestic and family violence in their local area. Human service workers in the community raised concern about clients' needs not being met, lack of co-ordination amongst services, confusion amongst service providers of who was doing what, and lack of understanding of the complexities of violence and abuse amongst workers. As a result, a qualitative, interpretative study involving face-to-face semi-structured interviews with twenty-two human service workers and two women who had experienced domestic and family violence was undertaken to examine the barriers to working collaboratively at the local level. Once barriers to co-ordination were identified and talked about, workers were able to visualize their local response. This included naming practice strategies to build co-ordination and integration of workers and agencies to create sustainable long-term practice, and advocating as a community for the re-introduction of domestic violence specialized services and programmes to meet local needs.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wendt, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn114</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Building and Sustaining Local Co-ordination: An Australian Rural Community Responds to Domestic and Family Violence]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn106v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Predictors of Role Legitimacy and Role Adequacy of Social Workers Working with Substance-Using Clients]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn106v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Role adequacy (feeling knowledgeable about one's work) and role legitimacy (believing that one has the right to address certain client issues) have long been key theoretical constructs regarding explanations why various helping professionals are reluctant to address drug misuse problems with clients. This study examines these concepts in a sample of social workers and social work students. Using regression analysis, it was determined that the social workers who had more clients with drug problems, had taken a course in drug work and had support for their role were more likely to feel legitimate in their work with drug-using clients. Training in drug use identification and intervention, being male, having more clients with drug problems and role support predicted role adequacy. Having a Master's degree, work setting and job function were not related to role adequacy or role legitimacy. Implications for social work education are discussed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Loughran, H., Hohman, M., Finnegan, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn106</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Predictors of Role Legitimacy and Role Adequacy of Social Workers Working with Substance-Using Clients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn101v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Systematic Review of Structural Equation Modelling in Social Work Research]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn101v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Structural equation modelling (SEM) is serving an increasingly important role in developing knowledge for the social work profession. Numerous advances have made the software more user-friendly, enabling users to conduct analyses without fully understanding the underlying assumptions or the implications from their analytic decisions. Unlike other fields, there have not been any published reviews in social work research that systematically describe and critique the use of SEM. This study systematically reviewed how SEM is used in social work research and the extent to which it reflects best practices. Thirty-two articles from top-ranked social work journals published from 2001 to 2007 were examined. Of the different types of SEM, the most commonly used was confirmatory factor analysis. Strengths of the research reviewed included examining models and measures not previously tested empirically and generating new insights into old topics through the use of SEM. Weaknesses included significant model modifications without theoretical justification or substantive interpretations. Suggestions are offered for improving applications of SEM in social work research. Specifically, we encourage social work researchers to test competing models, to make model modifications only when theoretically justified, to detail the process of making modifications and to use estimation procedures appropriate to the data.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guo, B., Perron, B. E., Gillespie, D. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn101</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Systematic Review of Structural Equation Modelling in Social Work Research]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn100v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Parental Monitoring, Religious Involvement and Drug Use Among Latino and Non-Latino Youth in the Southwestern United States]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn100v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The purpose of this study was to examine parental monitoring practice and religious involvement (protective factor) and substance use among Hispanic and Non-Hispanic adolescents in the Southwest of the US. We also relied on social control theories to guide our investigation of why adolescents may choose not to use drugs. The sample was <I>n</I> = 1087 adolescents, the age ranged from thirteen to fifteen years, and the gender distribution was approximately equal. There were 71 percent Hispanics and 29 percent non-Hispanics in the sample. A number of measures were used including recent substance use, religiosity, religious affiliation, parental monitoring, parental permissiveness, parental norms, and acculturation. Linear regressions were used to examine the relationship between the variables of interest and the outcomes. Although the effect sizes of the significant relationships were modest, our findings are of interest because they reinforce the importance of the role of parents in the lives of their adolescents and supports previous studies that find that parents have great influence on children's behaviours including substaince use. The results suggest that adolescents benefit from having clear rules from their parents concerning substance, and from believing that there is some kind of consequence attached to their behavior. This study is useful to practitioners, social workers, educators and other professionals working with parents and adolescents.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parsai, M., Marsiglia, F. F., Kulis, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-03</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn100</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Parental Monitoring, Religious Involvement and Drug Use Among Latino and Non-Latino Youth in the Southwestern United States]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn098v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Child Welfare Interventions: Patterns of Social Work Practice]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn098v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Some 10 years ago one of the authors embarked on a research study examining the potential for social workers to shift from a child protection to a child welfare practice orientation (Spratt, 2000; 2001; Spratt and Callan, 2004). The research reported here develops that work; examining how social workers respond to &lsquo;child care problems&rsquo; (CCPs). The results indicate that Northern Irish Health and Social Services Trusts (equivalent to Local Authorities in England and Wales) have responded to social policy goals to balance the protection of a lesser number of children whilst meeting the welfare needs of the greater by reducing the number of referrals designated &lsquo;child protection investigations&rsquo; (CPIs) and increasing the number of CCPs. Closer analysis reveals, however, that a filtering system has been developed by social workers to address perceived child protection risks within CCP cases. Paradoxically, this leads to early closure of the more concerning cases, with service provision largely confined to the least concerning. The authors argue that the ways in which social workers balance social policing and supportive functions in practice may indicate possible responses to an increase in referred families anticipated within <I>Every Child Matters</I> (Chief Secretary to the Treasury, 2003)</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hayes, D., Spratt, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn098</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Child Welfare Interventions: Patterns of Social Work Practice]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn084v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Social Support Use as a Parental Coping Strategy: Its Impact on Outcome of Child and Parenting Problems--A Six-Month Follow-Up]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn084v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Long standing policy and practice interest in Prevention and Family Support has been reiterated in recent years in the <I>Every Child Matters</I> programme. At the same time, however, official concerns have been expressed about the high thresholds operated by mainstream Children's Services, whose focus is, to a considerable degree, on safeguarding children. This concern emanates from a recognition that many applicants who do not receive a service because of the thresholds operated, have considerable needs. Without access to services, it is thought, there is a danger that they will end up being re-referred with greater problems and higher risks to the children. This paper focuses on this issue by carrying out a longitudinal comparative study on outcomes for families who, while having child and parenting problems, did not qualify for a service because of the high thresholds operating. In particular it focuses on the relationship between their social support and outcomes at six months. The findings show a significant relationship between the adequacy of some forms of support and positive outcomes. The significance of this for policy and practice is explored, including recognition of the importance of informal support to outcomes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheppard, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn084</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Social Support Use as a Parental Coping Strategy: Its Impact on Outcome of Child and Parenting Problems--A Six-Month Follow-Up]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn096v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Performance Measurement in Adult Social Care: Looking Backwards and Forwards]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn096v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Approaches arising from the publication of performance data for adult social care in the UK nationally have led to unintended and often perverse consequences. A case is made in this paper for examining locally-based models, which offer substantial benefits to both managers and practitioners, and by extension, service users. Whilst there is no shortage of statements outlining the intentions behind monitoring performance in this setting, actual evidence as to its benefits is lacking. Different approaches to performance measurement (both in the UK and elsewhere) and their relevance to recent debate, particularly that which advocates the wholesale abandoning of performance monitoring, are examined. This review of existing evidence, as opposed to rhetoric, suggests that a different approach, involving the local collection and interpretation of data, offers an opportunity for workers to foster a culture of enquiry. Such a change in emphasis may require the implementation of a different set of incentives to those previously in operation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clarkson, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn096</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Performance Measurement in Adult Social Care: Looking Backwards and Forwards]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn097v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Unified Assessment: Policy, Implementation and Practice]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn097v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The introduction of single and unified assessment processes across England and Wales heralds opportunities to develop more consistent approaches to the assessment and management of care that are underpinned by an agreed evidence base and inform the development of person-centred, outcome-focused support. This paper presents key findings from a qualitative study that considers the implementation and effects of unified assessment on direct practice in general and care management in particular. Drawing on interview and focus group data that reflect the experiences of strategic and operational staff, this paper describes key challenges to the development and implementation of unified assessment procedures, highlights the ways in which unified assessment has facilitated positive changes to practice and explores aspects of unified assessment where translation into practice has proved difficult. It suggests that unified assessment promotes the more consistent application of eligibility criteria and encourages more creative approaches to both care and service delivery planning. However, considerable variability in the nature and volume of information collected by practitioners, who expressed reservations about the domain approach to assessment, is noted and problems relating to the sharing and management of information are highlighted. Recommendations to inform assessment practice across the UK are presented and areas for staff training are identified.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seddon, D., Robinson, C., Perry, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn097</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Unified Assessment: Policy, Implementation and Practice]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn085v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Paying the Piper and Calling the Tune: Power and the Direct Payment Relationship]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn085v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper provides empirical evidence from original research, which investigated the impact on the support relationship of the direct employment of workers, by direct payment users. The study used a grounded theory approach, with questionnaires to measure job satisfaction and stress, and in-depth interviews with respondents. It explored and compared the experiences of eight direct payment relationships with eight traditional service delivery homecare relationships. The research reveals the importance of the concept of power in helping us to understand the effect of direct employment and, based on this research, makes some suggestions for policy and practice.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leece, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn085</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Paying the Piper and Calling the Tune: Power and the Direct Payment Relationship]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn082v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Impact of Regulatory Fitness Requirements on Disabled Social Work Students]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn082v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The Disability Commission of Great Britain conducted a Formal Investigation into the impact of regulatory fitness requirements on disabled people in three public sector professions, including social work. This article reports on the types of fitness requirements that have an impact on disabled social work students, and how these are interpreted and implemented in practice. IN terms of the regulatory framework, there is a requirement for mental and physical fitness in England and Wales, but not in Scotland. These requirements appear more stringent for social work students than for qualified social workers. There is no explicit mention of the Disability Discrimination Act in the regulatory framework. Key stakeholder organisations find fitness requirements unclear and articulated the need for clearer guidance for practice purposes. Different challenges present at different stages of social work education and there is a variety of ad hoc management strategies leading to the potential for discrimination against disabled people.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sin, C. H., Fong, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn082</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Impact of Regulatory Fitness Requirements on Disabled Social Work Students]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn079v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Labelling Clients 'Risky': Social Work and the Neo-liberal Welfare State]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn079v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The literature on neo-liberal transformations of the welfare state and forms of governance&mdash;inspired by Foucault's concept of governmentality&mdash;has much to offer theorizations of the role of social work in contemporary society. Rather than assuming a top/down analysis in which power is located within individuals or institutions, power is &lsquo;not a matter of imposing a sovereign will, but instead a process of enlisting the cooperation of chains of actors who "translate" power from one locale to another&rsquo; (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="BCN079C9">Garland, 1997</cross-ref>, p. 182). The profession of social work occupies an intermediary space, charged with &lsquo;translating&rsquo; state power to individuals, families, groups and communities. In this paper, I use the experience of criminalized women to bring to life the theoretical understandings offered by neo-liberal analyses of the regulation of social marginality. I focus particularly on one key feature of neo-liberal governance&mdash;'risk thinking'&mdash;and examine the gendered nature of risk as a neo-liberal regulatory strategy across the penal&ndash;welfare complex. I conclude with a discussion of lessons learned from criminalized women about social work and risk assessment.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pollack, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn079</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Labelling Clients 'Risky': Social Work and the Neo-liberal Welfare State]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn080v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Women in No Man's Land: The Abortion Debate in the USA and Women Terminating Desired Pregnancies Due to Foetal Anomaly]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn080v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Abortion is a politicized and contested topic in many countries. In the USA, it is subject to particularly polarized debate and increasingly stringent policies. Women who terminate a desired preganancy due to diagnosis of foetal anomaly (TFA) are stuck in the middle of the debate. The debate is framed as "pro-life" vs. "pro-choice" though neither camp fits the experience of women who TFA. These women report a sense of responsibility and love toward the foetus that they refer to as their baby, yet they also make use of the choice to terminate the pregnancy when fetal anomaly is diagnosed. This article summarizes the historical context of abortion in the USA and then reports findings from qualitative data about the impact of the abortion debate on women who TFA. The social work person-in-environment perspective is shown to be crucial to assisting women in their coping.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McCoyd, J. L. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-27</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn080</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Women in No Man's Land: The Abortion Debate in the USA and Women Terminating Desired Pregnancies Due to Foetal Anomaly]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn056v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessing Student Social Workers' Professional Suitability: Comparing University Procedures in England]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn056v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Universities providing social work education and training must ensure that those who qualify as social workers are &lsquo;suitable&rsquo; or &lsquo;fit for practice&rsquo;&mdash;a gate-keeping role that has been discussed in a number of different national settings. In England, the introduction of registration for both qualified and student social workers has brought assessment of standards of professional conduct to the fore. For qualified workers, there is a single national &lsquo;conduct procedure&rsquo; involving a public panel hearing. In relation to student social workers, procedures are particular to each university, albeit subject to scrutiny by the professional body, which has, to date, offered little guidance. This paper reports on a study comparing procedures in different universities. These were found to vary in relation to a number of factors, such as whether professional suitability is an academic or disciplinary matter; the name of the procedure and rationale; its focus and scope; the personnel involved and possible outcomes. The paper concludes that such variation is in the interests of neither students nor the profession, and that the professional body might helpfully offer more guidance to universities, as well as being specific about their own role in relation to aspects of registration.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Currer, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn056</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessing Student Social Workers' Professional Suitability: Comparing University Procedures in England]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn058v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Infants in Australian Out-of-Home Care]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn058v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper presents findings from a study examining the out-of-home care (OOHC) experiences of children aged less than one year (infants), based on data collected by the NSW Department of Community Services (DoCS), Australia. The purpose of the study is to develop a profile of infant children in OOHC and to better understand why so many young children require OOHC services and their experiences with the child welfare system. Using administrative data, we employ both descriptive and multivariate analysis to explore how child, child maltreatment history and system factors are related to the placement of infants in care. Our results are in line with research conducted in the USA and UK. The most notable finding is the high child protection reporting rate and high entry rate by infants and by Indigenous infants in particular. The tendency for infants to stay in care longer than other children, coupled with a high entry rate to care, has and will continue to have a significant impact on the child welfare system and its consequences. The implications for development of policy and early intervention programmes are discussed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhou, A. Z., Chilvers, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn058</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Infants in Australian Out-of-Home Care]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn073v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of Problem-Based Learning on Social Work Students: Growth and Limits]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn073v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Social workers are expected to constantly improve their knowledge and experience and respond quickly to new challenges. Educators appreciate the significance of learning how to learn to prepare students for real-life demands at work. For these reasons, problem-based learning (PBL) has been used experimentally in the training of different disciplines including social work. In recent years, the University of Hong Kong implemented PBL to cultivate social work students' self-directed learning and group learning/collaboration abilities. A PBL Questionnaire was devised to assess the growth of students in these areas. Students were invited to fill in the PBLQ at the beginning and at the end of the PBL programme. Two focus groups of graduates and agency supervisors were also conducted to see how PBL training might affect work performance. The PBLQ scores reflected a varied personal growth profile across the different student cohorts. The training stimulated their growth in employing multiple sources of learning, directing their own learning goals and activities, and teamwork collaboration. But growth in group learning abilities was not found. While there was positive feedback from the graduates and supervisors, generalization of the findings requires more rigorous exploration.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lam, D. O. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn073</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of Problem-Based Learning on Social Work Students: Growth and Limits]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn059v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Social Workers in Community Care Practice: Ideologies and Interactions with Older People]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn059v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Since the inception of the NHS and Community Care in 1990, there has been a proliferation of studies examining its implementation at the front line. Considerable attention has been aimed at understanding how it is that social work practitioners, charged with the responsibility to implement community care recommendations for older people, are doing so in a challenging care environment. How a practitioner's ideological frame of reference may impact on his/her practice interactions remains relatively unanswered. However, the course by which professional ideology matures and then directs practice would appear to both complex and multifaceted. The outcome is one that may render the professional both powerful and political, and one that may leave the older care recipient both vulnerable and stigmatized. This paper explores community care practice with older people, emphasizing the ideological underpinnings in practice and their influence on practice interactions. Social work practitioners working on older people's teams in two contrasting communities in England were interviewed to discuss their assessment and care management interactions with older people. Using grounded theory and Goffman's theoretical constructs within frame analysis, a conceptual model for practice emerged, reinforcing that practitioners' understandings of social events, anchored in government and professional discourse and individual perceptions about older people, enabled them to organize and influence the interaction to lead to a professionally determined outcome. The routine work of assessment and care management became very powerful in absence of strategic intention by the practitioner. A move to more strategic behaviour occurred when practice dilemmas required practitioners to intervene, informed by their professionally based values juxtaposed against those supported within official discourse. The findings provide an insight into how social work practitioners manage to deliver community care in a complex environment. The outcomes also reinforce the need for practitioners to develop an understanding of how they construct their social realities, as this may impact on the experience of community care for older people.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sullivan, M. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn059</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Social Workers in Community Care Practice: Ideologies and Interactions with Older People]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn057v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Family Intervention Projects: A Site of Social Work Practice]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn057v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Family Intervention Projects (FIPs) provide intensive support to &lsquo;problem families&rsquo; and are a core element of the Government's Respect Action Plan (2006). Drawing on recent research findings from an independent evaluation of the FIP &lsquo;Signpost&rsquo;, this paper aims to offer a new insight into our understanding of FIPs. The paper draws attention to two key points. First, the organizational context within which Signpost has emerged is one dominated by a social work ethos. It is suggest that the FIP has been implemented in a way which has provided social work professionals with an opportunity to engage in the kind of creative practice that proceduralization, bureaucracy and managerialism have made impossible to achieve in mainstream social work arenas. Following on from this, the paper emphasizes the limitations of evaluating anti-social behaviour policy effects without due consideration of the local policy and practice context within which policies are embedded. The paper is not intended to discount important critical reflections on FIPs, but seeks to illustrate the gaps that can open up between political rhetoric and policy effect, demonstrating why we should not be too quick to foreclose the possibilities afforded to vulnerable families by this type of intervention.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parr, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn057</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Family Intervention Projects: A Site of Social Work Practice]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn026v3?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Questioning Habermasian Social Work: A Note on Some Alternative Theoretical Resources]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn026v3?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>It has been maintained that the social theory of Jurgen Habermas may assist social workers, and others, involved in child protection and related forms of endeavour. Whilst welcoming Hayes and Houston's willingness to utilize social theory, it is argued that Habermas' work is also problematic because of an unsatisfactory approach to issues connected to power differentials. In this context, it will be suggested that there is a need to be wary about the emphasis which Habermas places on the possibilities for unconstrained dialogue. Moreover, the work of a number of other European writers may help to illuminate key factors which Habermas neglects and also provide alternative theoretical resources for social workers and those working in associated fields.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garrett, P. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn026</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Questioning Habermasian Social Work: A Note on Some Alternative Theoretical Resources]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn027v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Accountable and Countable: Information Management Systems and the Bureaucratization of Social Work]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn027v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A key feature of new public management is the tendency to equate quality and accountability with documentation (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="BCN027C35">Tsui and Cheung, 2004</cross-ref>). Human service organizations increasingly rely on computer databases to compile and record client information and to demonstrate outcomes for quality assurance and accountability purposes. This has resulted in substantial changes in work practices, processes and relationships for social workers. This paper draws on interview data from social workers in several Australian agencies to examine professional interactions with, and response to, changes in their work after the introduction of new technologies. It particularly focuses on the shift of accountabilities from professional values and identities to organizational and bureaucratic accountabilities. The paper recognizes that while social workers have always been subject to organizational accountabilities, due to the changes in social service delivery and limited practitioner input into the implementation of new technologies, tensions between professional and bureaucratic accountabilities have intensified.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Burton, J., van den Broek, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn027</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Accountable and Countable: Information Management Systems and the Bureaucratization of Social Work]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn053v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Descriptive Tyranny of the Common Assessment Framework: Technologies of Categorization and Professional Practice in Child Welfare]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn053v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The Common Assessment Framework is a standard assessment tool to be used by all professionals working with children for assessment and referral. The CAF is hailed as a needs-led, evidence-based tool which will promote uniformity, ensure appropriate &lsquo;early intervention&rsquo;, reduce referral rates to local authority children's services and lead to the evolution of &lsquo;a common language&rsquo; amongst child welfare professionals. This paper presents findings from a study, funded under the Economic and Social Research Council's e-Society Programme. Our purpose in is not primarily evaluative, rather we illustrate the impacts of CAF as a technology on the everyday professional practices in child welfare. We analyse the descriptive, stylistic and interpretive demands it places on practitioners in child welfare and argue that practitioners make strategic and moral decisions about whether and when to complete a CAF and how to do so. These are based on assessments of their accountabilities, their level of child welfare competence and their domain-specific knowledge, moral judgements and the institutional contexts in which these are played out.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[White, S., Hall, C., Peckover, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn053</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Descriptive Tyranny of the Common Assessment Framework: Technologies of Categorization and Professional Practice in Child Welfare]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn051v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Recent Policy Initiatives in Early Childhood and the Challenges for the Social Work Profession]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn051v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The Labour Government in the UK has announced, as part of its launch of <I>The Children's Plan</I>, that it &lsquo;wants to make this country the best place in the world for children and young people to grow up&rsquo; in. This latest Plan is further evidence of the surge of interest that there has been in children (and, in particular, early childhood) over the last ten years in the UK and indeed elsewhere. Many of the recent policy and practice initiatives have implications for social workers working with young children. Yet, social work as a profession, in comparison with education, has remained relatively silent on these initiatives and it is hard to find any critical analysis of these developments in terms of either their underlying discourses or their implications for social workers. This article sets out to address these gaps by providing a critical analysis of: what types of knowledge regarding the early years have gained political currency; why and how this is the case; and what the implications are for the role and practices of social workers. The article proposes that discourses of &lsquo;need&rsquo; and &lsquo;provision&rsquo; mask more powerful discourses of economics, social control and risk avoidance, and it concludes by advocating more critically reflexive social work practice with young children and their families.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Winter, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn051</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recent Policy Initiatives in Early Childhood and the Challenges for the Social Work Profession]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn054v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Communication, Recognition and Social Work: Aligning the Ethical Theories of Habermas and Honneth]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn054v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The modern world is replete with ethical challenges of Orwellian proportions. The violation of human rights and misrecognition of identities are two of the most pressing examples. In this paper, the ethical theories of Habermas and Honneth are aligned as a way of addressing these specific challenges within social work. It is suggested that these theories are complementary, mutually rectifying and concordant at the meta-ethical level of analysis. The alignment is also justified, pragmatically, through the construction of three hypothetical vignettes demonstrating different kinds of practice dilemmas. The need for <I>egalitarian communication</I> and the imperative to <I>recognize</I> human identity in all its dimensions subsequently emerge as the two foundation stones for ethical deliberation in social work.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Houston, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn054</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Communication, Recognition and Social Work: Aligning the Ethical Theories of Habermas and Honneth]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn033v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Abuse of Children in West Africa: Implications for Social Work Education and Practice]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn033v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article discusses the pernicious problem of several abuses of children and the lack of professional social work programmes to address the problem in three West African countries of Ghana, Nigeria and Togo. Despite inaccurate statistical data, available public information reveals an alarming ascendancy of the problem in the region. Abuse and neglect of children in the sub-region has become a very serious issue of violation of human rights, social justice and violence against children, which demands a call for action on behalf of the children. The article outlined the various incidents of child sexual abuse, child trafficking, child marriage, <I>Trokosi</I> and neglect of disabled children in the sub-region. Poverty and traditional cultural practices have been discussed as the main causes of this phenomenon. The implications for social work education, policy, research and practice have been discussed in addition to a call for enforcement of legislations and mass education of citizens in the sub-region.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sossou, M.-A., Yogtiba, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn033</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Abuse of Children in West Africa: Implications for Social Work Education and Practice]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn038v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Qualitative Examination of Power between Child Welfare Workers and Parents]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn038v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This qualitative study examines the distribution of power in the working relationship between child welfare workers and parents mandated to services due to child abuse and/or neglect. In child welfare settings, the relationship between workers and parents is complicated by institutional power structures governing rules and regulations for practice. Paradoxically, workers are expected to share power with families through the implementation of empowerment, collaboration and strength-based practices. This article focuses on three emergent themes: parents' and workers' feelings of powerlessness, their ability to each wield power in the relationship, and their perceptions of how power should be distributed. The emergent themes are discussed through the lens of three power constructs&mdash;hierarchical and imbalanced, negotiated and reciprocal, and shared and balanced power&mdash;as a theoretical and conceptual framework. Our findings indicate that <I>how</I> workers and parents choose to interact may influence service outcomes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bundy-Fazioli, K., Briar-Lawson, K., Hardiman, E. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn038</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Qualitative Examination of Power between Child Welfare Workers and Parents]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn036v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of Welfare Organizations: The Contribution of Leadership Styles, Staff Cohesion, and Worker Empowerment]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn036v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Numerous recent studies reveal the contribution of leadership and leadership style, in particular, to effectiveness in different organizations (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="BCN036C66">Sosik <I>et al.</I>, 1998</cross-ref>; <cross-ref type="bib" refid="BCN036C50">Ogbnna and Harris, 2000</cross-ref>; <cross-ref type="bib" refid="BCN036C44">Hoyt and Blascovich, 2003</cross-ref>; <cross-ref type="bib" refid="BCN036C45">Hullinger, 2003</cross-ref>; <cross-ref type="bib" refid="BCN036C8a">Berson and Avolio, 2004</cross-ref>), including the field of welfare organizations (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="BCN036C39">Gummer, 1995</cross-ref>; <cross-ref type="bib" refid="BCN036C1">Arches, 1997</cross-ref>; <cross-ref type="bib" refid="BCN036C33">Fisher, 2005</cross-ref>; <cross-ref type="bib" refid="BCN036C48">Mary, 2005</cross-ref>). These publications suggest a preference for the transformational, compared with the transactional, leadership style. However, the studies reviewed do not examine the contribution of organizational leadership compared with other aspects of organizational life. Using the previous studies as its point of departure, the present research examines the contribution of the leadership styles of the directors in welfare departments to the effectiveness of the social workers in these organizations. However, it also undertakes another task, by comparing the contribution of leadership style to effectiveness with that of staff cohesion and social worker empowerment. Thus, the findings and discussion presented in this paper compare the respective contributions of three central levels of the organization to effectiveness&mdash;the administrative level (director's leadership styles), the staff level (staff cohesion), and the individual level of the social worker (worker empowerment). The research examines this issue in a public welfare department in Israel.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boehm, A., Yoels, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn036</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of Welfare Organizations: The Contribution of Leadership Styles, Staff Cohesion, and Worker Empowerment]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn031v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['Yesterday's Men': The Inspectors of the Royal Scottish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, 1888-1968]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn031v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper presents findings from an in-depth study of the archives of the Royal Scottish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children. Its particular focus is the work of the Society's Inspectors. The Inspectors' guiding principles, beliefs and motivations are brought out from a variety of archived sources including case records, Society Annual Reports and Minutes, memoranda and memoirs. The period of study covers the origins of the Society in the late 1880s until 1968, when the passing of the Social Work (Scotland) Act gave local authorities greater powers and responsibilities to promote child welfare; this legislation signalled the beginning of the end of the RSSPCC's dominance in the field of the prevention of child cruelty. The paper provides a rich eighty-year-long picture of a group of men&mdash;and women&mdash;who belonged to the first child welfare agency to intervene systematically in the homes and lives of families. The Inspectors' practices were both punitive and materially helpful. This study of the Inspectors and their attitudes to fathers, mothers and beliefs about what was best for children seeks to place their work and outlooks within a history of modern social work and suggests that the Inspectors and their work can be seen as part of the DNA of social work.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clapton, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn031</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA['Yesterday's Men': The Inspectors of the Royal Scottish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, 1888-1968]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn034v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cane of Love: Parental Attitudes towards Corporal Punishment in Korea]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn034v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yang, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn034</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cane of Love: Parental Attitudes towards Corporal Punishment in Korea]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn032v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Speaking from the Margins: A Critical Reflection on the 'Spiritual-but-not-Religious' Discourse in Social Work]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn032v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper attempts to make visible the invisible Euro-Christian ethnocentrism and individualism in the &lsquo;spiritual-but-not-religious&rsquo; discourse in social work. A critical analysis of the current literature on spirituality and social work, intertwined with the authors' personal narratives of spirituality and religion, calls into question the subject positions of social work authors who argue for differentiating spirituality from religion. We ask: From whose vantage point is the &lsquo;spiritual-but-not-religious&rsquo; discourse produced? What gets legitimized and who gets excluded from this particular construction of spirituality? This paper deconstructs the power relations of race, ethnicity, and sexuality in the discourse of spirituality in social work. It destabilizes the assumption of spirituality as non-sectarian and inclusive. Contrary to many social work authors and educators' best intention of inclusivity, we contend that the &lsquo;spiritual-but-not-religious&rsquo; discourse in social work may have inadvertently reproduced the process of colonial othering and further marginalization of racialized ethnic groups who are more often represented as &lsquo;religious&rsquo;.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wong, Y.-L. R., Vinsky, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn032</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Speaking from the Margins: A Critical Reflection on the 'Spiritual-but-not-Religious' Discourse in Social Work]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn030v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Life after Caring: The Post-Caring Experiences of Former Carers]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn030v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This qualitative study was informed by grounded theory and data were gathered primarily through semi-structured in-depth interviews with thirty-seven theoretically sampled former carers. They were all white British, lived in the East Midlands and were predominately over sixty (68 per cent) and female (70 per cent). With the exception of one, all had cared for a close relative, 65 per cent having cared for a partner/spouse. Most of their dependants were older adults and each case the cessation of caring had coincided with the death of the dependant. The findings showed that post-caring life for the interviewees had an identifiable trajectory with three phases&mdash;the &lsquo;post-caring void&rsquo;, &lsquo;closing down "the caring time"&lsquo;and &lsquo;constructing life post-caring&rsquo;. Each of these phases involved a distinct set of experiences. In addition, the study established that 70 per cent of those in the sample had cared more than once. Thus, two new concepts&mdash;'the post-caring trajectory' and the &lsquo;serial carer&rsquo;&mdash;were developed to reflect these findings. Suggestions are made about ways in which policy, practice and further research can be developed in order to ensure there is effective provision for those who have ceased caring.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larkin, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-27</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn030</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Life after Caring: The Post-Caring Experiences of Former Carers]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn029v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What Are Child-Care Social Workers Doing in Relation to Infant Mental Health? An Exploration of Professional Ideologies and Practice Preferences within an Inter-Agency Context]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn029v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Infancy is a crucial time for interventions to reduce later developmental difficulties. In England, recent policy has required children's service delivery to be redesigned to attend to infant mental health across all four tiers of NHS provision through inter-agency networks of child-care professionals. The policy identifies child-care social workers as primary care professionals, able to recognize early infant mental health problems, promote mental health and prevent deterioration. Our paper explores whether, as a profession, English child-care social workers are well prepared in terms of their knowledge, ideological beliefs and professional acculturation to implement such changes to their practice. Empirical information is provided from a funded, independent evaluation of the implementation of the NSF policy at a local level. Data from professional focus group interviews describe and compare the differing professional ideologies and professional practice preferences within the infant mental health network of an English NHS Primary Care Trust in an urban local authority. The findings identified obstacles that were personal&ndash;ideological, cultural and structural in nature. Progress towards achieving the NSF policy standards appeared slight.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross, J. W., Hooper, L., Stenhouse, E., Sheaff, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn029</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What Are Child-Care Social Workers Doing in Relation to Infant Mental Health? An Exploration of Professional Ideologies and Practice Preferences within an Inter-Agency Context]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn028v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Safeguarding and System Change: Early Perceptions of the Implications for Adult Protection Services of the English Individual Budgets Pilots--A Qualitative Study]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn028v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Cash for care or consumer-directed services are increasing in scope and size in Europe and North America. The English Department of Health initiated a pilot form of personalised support for adults (Individual Budgets) in 13 local authorities that aimed to extend opportunities for users of social care services to determine their own priorities and preferences in the expectation that this will enhance their well-being. This article reports on and discusses interviews undertaken with adult protection leads in the 13 Individual Budgets sites about the linkages to their work, their perceptions of the launch of the pilots and the policy s fit with safeguarding and risk agendas. The interviews were undertaken as part of the national evaluation of the pilots, which aims to evaluate outcomes and identify the contexts and mechanisms of those outcomes. Findings of this part of the study were that the adult protection leads were not central to the early implementation of Individual Budgets and that some of their concerns about the risk of financial abuse were grounded in the extent of this problem among current service users. The implications of their perceptions for the roll out of Individual Budgets are debated in this article with a focus on risk and the policy congruence between potentially competing agendas of choice and control and of protection and harm reduction.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manthorpe, J., Stevens, M., Rapaport, J., Harris, J., Jacobs, S., Challis, D., Netten, A., Knapp, M., Wilberforce, M., Glendinning, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn028</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Safeguarding and System Change: Early Perceptions of the Implications for Adult Protection Services of the English Individual Budgets Pilots--A Qualitative Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm171v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Effect of Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment on Assessments under the 1983 Mental Health Act: An Increased Workload for Approved Social Workers?]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm171v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>There is an extensive body of research into trends in use of the 1983 Mental Health Act (MHA) and Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment (CRHT) teams, but only one study has examined the relationship between the two. The introduction of these teams led to the belief that use of the MHA would decrease as more people with mental health problems were treated in their own environment when in crisis and at risk of admission to hospital. However, in one county authority in south-east England, the numbers of MHA assessments continued to rise after the introduction of a CRHT team. To investigate this pattern, we examined a random sample of MHA assessments conducted in the catchment area of the CRHT team both in and out of office hours from two time periods&mdash;one before and one after the introduction of the CRHT team. The presence of the team was associated with a significant increase in the use of section 2 MHA, although the use of section 3 MHA decreased. To explore these findings, we held focus groups to obtain the views of mental health professionals on the reasons for the continued rise and how their views influenced decisions. We found that the role of the Approved Social Worker (ASW) was poorly understood in the new CRHT team and that communication between it and the ASWs was disjointed. Integration of ASWs into predominantly medical CRHT teams will assist joint decision making about use of the MHA and may help to reduce unnecessary compulsory hospital admissions.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Furminger, E., Webber, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcm171</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Effect of Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment on Assessments under the 1983 Mental Health Act: An Increased Workload for Approved Social Workers?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn016v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring the Impact of Parental Drug/Alcohol Problems on Children and Parents in a Midlands County in 2005/06]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn016v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper reports on a small-scale research project which used semi-structured interviews and a &lsquo;Draw and Write&rsquo; technique to explore the views of parents/carers and children and young people about the impact of parental substance use and implications for services. It was found that most adult participants recognized their need for help and had obtained treatment for their drug/alcohol use. They were often ambivalent or self-critical about their abilities as parents and had tried to combine their substance use with ensuring that the basic needs of their children had been met. Access to methadone prescriptions had helped stabilize the lives of those who had previously been heroin users, and parents' wishes to look after their children properly, or to resume their care, were a powerful motivator for them to stop using drugs/alcohol. The children in the study, who displayed considerable resilience, were aware of the emotional turmoil caused by their parents' substance use and they saw social workers as important people in their lives. It was also found that families in the study either needed substantial help from their extended family, or from social services (now Children's Social Care), or both. The implications of the study for professionals supporting substance-using families are highlighted.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fraser, C., McIntyre, A., Manby, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn016</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring the Impact of Parental Drug/Alcohol Problems on Children and Parents in a Midlands County in 2005/06]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm152v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Individual Budgets: Lessons from Early Users' Experiences]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm152v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Within the context of modernization, there has been a trend towards &lsquo;cash-for-care&rsquo; schemes designed to bring choice and control closer to the service user. In England, Individual Budgets (IBs) are being piloted, with the aim of promoting personalized support for disabled people and other users of social care services. This paper reports on the experiences and outcomes of early IB users two to three months after first being offered an IB. The users included adults with physical/sensory impairments, learning difficulties, mental health problems and older people. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with nine service users and five proxies. The findings suggest that IBs have the potential to be innovative and life-enhancing. However, achieving this potential in practice depends on a range of other factors, including changes in the routine practices and organizational culture of adult social care services and ensuring users have access to appropriate documentation and support. Any conclusions drawn from the experiences of these early IB users must be treated with caution. The findings nevertheless indicate some of the issues that will need to be addressed as IBs are implemented more widely to replace conventional forms of adult social care provision.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rabiee, P., Moran, N., Glendinning, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcm152</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Individual Budgets: Lessons from Early Users' Experiences]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn013v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Management, Leadership and Resources in Children's Homes: What Influences Outcomes in Residential Child-Care Settings?]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn013v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article provides an overview of research, originally funded by the Department of Health, about the internal management and use of resources in residential child care. It explores ways in which children's homes are managed and leadership is established and the relationship of these to their use of resources and the outcomes for young people in their care. The paper examines variations in the functioning of a sample of 45 non-specialist children's homes drawn from local authority and independent sectors in England. Utilising both qualitative and quantitative analyses including an economics component, the functional relationships of structures, processes, resources and service user outcomes are investigated. The results of multi-level modelling analysis, used to draw together the different strands of the research, are discussed. Main findings indicate that the influence which the <I>process</I> of providing care has on the kind of outcomes experienced by young people is of paramount importance. The paper relates findings to areas for development in practice and its management, specifically in terms of training and policy arenas.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hicks, L., Gibbs, I., Weatherly, H., Byford, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn013</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Management, Leadership and Resources in Children's Homes: What Influences Outcomes in Residential Child-Care Settings?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm170v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Working in Human Services: How Do Experiences and Working Conditions in Child Welfare Social Work Compare?]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm170v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Child welfare agencies in many rich countries are having difficulty recruiting and retaining social workers. However, these problems are not unique to child welfare: retention problems have also been widely reported in both mental and general health facilities. In this paper, we compare the perceptions of work and working conditions held by child welfare social workers with the perceptions held by other professional human service workers in the public sector in Sweden. Do the social workers' experiences of their tasks or organizational conditions differ from the other groups, and, if so, how? Are workforce problems particularly acute in child welfare, or do social workers in this field share more or less common problems with other human service professionals? We found that although social workers in general, and child welfare social workers in particular, made positive assessments of some dimensions of their working lives, social work was unusually demanding among human service professions on several measures of workload, complexity of tasks and quality of management. The strains of the job that social workers expressed call upon employers to promote working conditions that offer more support, and to recognize and value social workers for their work.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tham, P., Meagher, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-11</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcm170</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Working in Human Services: How Do Experiences and Working Conditions in Child Welfare Social Work Compare?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn023v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Befriending Excluded Families in Tower Hamlets: The Emotional Labour of Family Support Workers in Cases of Child Protection and Family Support]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn023v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper describes the befriending of severely excluded families, particularly Bangladeshi and Somali families, in Tower Hamlets, East London by Family Support Workers (FSWs). Tower Hamlets is one of the most deprived boroughs in the UK. The study is derived from an evaluation of the Family Welfare Association's (FWA's) Tower Hamlets Family Support Services (FSSs) conducted by South Bank University. A key finding is that engaging the emotions of families enables high-quality and effective support in the family home. FSWs win trust and elicit narratives from families, particularly from mothers and children. The narratives of families are a rich source of informing better practice. In line with government objectives, the participatory work of FSWs helps to balance understanding on family support, health and child protection. The early identification of child protection issues is particularly important in mitigating their worst effects. FSWs gain trust and early disclosure on child protection cases. This prevents child-care problems from deteriorating into child protection issues. FSWs also act as informal advocates and help to balance social service assessments with the views of families. FSWs take a proactive, non-stigmatizing, non-intrusive approach to families. FSWs are sensitive and responsive to the emotions, ethnicity, gender and specific needs of families.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gray, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn023</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Befriending Excluded Families in Tower Hamlets: The Emotional Labour of Family Support Workers in Cases of Child Protection and Family Support]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn017v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Training for Change: Early Days of Individual Budgets and the Implications for Social Work and Care Management Practice: A Qualitative Study of the Views of Trainers]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn017v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Individual Budgets are central to the implementation of English government policy goals in social care. Like other consumer-directed or self-directed support programmes operating in parts of the developed world, they are envisaged as a way of increasing individuals' choice and control over social care resources provided by the public sector. While the opportunities they provide for people using services have been identified prospectively in the English context and reflect positive outcomes internationally, little attention in England has been paid to the potential impact on the redesign of social workers' and others' current roles and practice and the training that might be necessary. This article draws on the Department of Health-commissioned evaluation of the thirteen pilot Individual Budget schemes, which aims to evaluate outcomes and identify the contexts and mechanisms of those outcomes. The article focuses on a sub-set of the study that comprised an exploration of early training activities for social workers/care managers and wider stakeholders around the introduction of Individual Budgets. It is based on interviews with representatives from all thirteen pilot local authorities. What happens to social work in adult social services departments in England may be determined in part by these pilots; however, the article also highlights the role of those responsible for training in managing the demands upon social workers/care managers, in responding to their concerns and aspirations, and their possible responsibilities for training people using services in their new consumer roles.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manthorpe, J., Jacobs, S., Rapaport, J., Challis, D., Netten, A., Glendinning, C., Stevens, M., Wilberforce, M., Knapp, M., Harris, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn017</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Training for Change: Early Days of Individual Budgets and the Implications for Social Work and Care Management Practice: A Qualitative Study of the Views of Trainers]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn021v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Growth in the Shadow of War: The Case of Social Workers and Nurses Working in a Shared War Reality]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcn021v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This study aimed to assess post-traumatic stress symptoms and vicarious traumatization (VT) versus post-traumatic growth (PTG) among Israeli practitioners who shared war-related reality with their clients during the Second Lebanon&ndash;Israel war (2006). In addition, the contribution of potency (one's personal resource) and the role of peri-traumatic dissociation (the emotional detachment activated during or immediately after a traumatic event) were examined. Two months after the war, a convenience sample of 204 practitioners (seventy-six nurses and 128 social workers), all residents and employees in the Haifa area, were administered a self-report questionnaire. Findings showed that nurses had higher post-traumatic growth (PTG) compared with social workers. Personal resource (potency) was found to contribute to the reduction of vicarious traumatization (VT), whereas peri-traumatic dissociation was found to contribute to both PTG and VT in the group of social workers.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lev-Wiesel, R., Goldblatt, H., Eisikovits, Z., Admi, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcn021</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Growth in the Shadow of War: The Case of Social Workers and Nurses Working in a Shared War Reality]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm157v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Working Girls: Abuse or Choice in Street-Level Sex Work? A Study of Homeless Women in Nottingham]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm157v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This paper uses fifteen indices of abuse and a definition of &lsquo;coercion&rsquo; as &lsquo;constraint, restraint, compulsion; the application of force to control the action of a voluntary agent&rsquo; (<cross-ref type="bib" refid="BCM157C60">OED Online, 2006</cross-ref>) to explore how homeless women understand their choice to sex work. Twenty-six homeless women were interviewed, nine of whom had sex worked. A structured, qualitative questionnaire was used in a case study design from which information was gathered about the relationship between a woman's experience of abuse and coercion and her decision to sex work. By exploring the motivations given by women as to why they sex worked, it is argued that homeless women's decisions are, in part, a consequence of systemic familial abuse and coercion from abusive partners. However, in responding to the complex needs of such women, it is also suggested that &lsquo;abuse&rsquo; and &lsquo;coercion&rsquo; should not routinely equate to &lsquo;victimhood&rsquo;. Consequently, our findings challenge the homogeneous approach to &lsquo;victimization&rsquo; as demonstrated within the government's <I>Prostitution Strategy</I> (Home Office, 2006<I>a</I>). Subsequent recommendations are made for social work practice in the context of the Strategy when working with abused and coerced homeless women who choose to sex work.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harding, R., Hamilton, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcm157</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Working Girls: Abuse or Choice in Street-Level Sex Work? A Study of Homeless Women in Nottingham]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm158v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[But Is It Social Work? Some Reflections on Mistaken Identities]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm158v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Throughout its history, social work has been marked by disputes about its identity, especially in the &lsquo;global North&rsquo;. The question of where boundaries, if any, should be drawn around the profession is one that apparently has not been resolved. In particular, should the focus of social work be on &lsquo;micro&rsquo; or &lsquo;macro&rsquo; issues and what problems are at stake in such debates? As professional social work continues to develop in many countries, these questions continue to be posed and to be contested. This paper reviews the core issues of such debates, noting that they are important because they show the inevitably contested nature of social work and arguing for a breadth of vision in discussions about this. It suggests that by considering a common thread but, at the same time, recognizing diversity, the profession will be able to maintain and further develop a coherent broad identity. In particular, it is suggested that countries of the &lsquo;global North&rsquo;, where modern social work first began to professionalize, can gain by considering development of different &lsquo;authentic&rsquo; forms of social work in the &lsquo;global South&rsquo;.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugman, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcm158</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[But Is It Social Work? Some Reflections on Mistaken Identities]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm155v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What's in a Name: 'Client', 'Patient', 'Customer', 'Consumer', 'Expert by Experience', 'Service User'--What's Next?]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm155v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article challenges the terms we use to describe the relationship between those who assess and commission services and those who are the recipient of those services. In particular, the article identifies the different terms that have been used in British social work, including &lsquo;client&rsquo;, &lsquo;customer&rsquo;, &lsquo;consumer&rsquo;, &lsquo;service user&rsquo; and &lsquo;expert by experience&rsquo;, highlighting their assumptive worlds and the relationships the terms suggest and signify. Service user (the most popular term at present) is highlighted and critically analysed and found to be increasingly problematic and unable to describe the complexities of the service&ndash;recipient relationship. Alternative terms are discussed and found wanting, whilst a possible way forward is suggested to avoid the negative connotations of any one particular term.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McLaughlin, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcm155</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What's in a Name: 'Client', 'Patient', 'Customer', 'Consumer', 'Expert by Experience', 'Service User'--What's Next?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm154v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Expertise and Experience: People with Experiences of Using Services and Carers' Views of the Mental Capacity Act 2005]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm154v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The views of people with experiences of using services and the views of their carers about the 2005 Mental Capacity Act (England and Wales) are reported in this article. Interviews with ten people about the detail of the Act prior to its implementation revealed that they welcomed the principles of the Act, and were able to relate these to aspects of their experiences. The Act's framework for planning around care and treatment and for making advance decisions was seen as offering greater choice and empowerment. Comments were made about the need for the Act to be publicized by professionals, for practitioners to provide specific information and for people with experiences of using services and carers to be included in training and monitoring. The data also revealed some concerns about implementation processes, about missed opportunities for legislative reform and the difficulty of balancing risks and safeguards. Such issues are likely to be highly relevant to social work practice; social workers are alerted to the expertise existing among many people with experiences of using services and carers and to the variations in opinion and knowledge likely to be found among people using services and carers.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manthorpe, J., Rapaport, J., Stanley, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcm154</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Expertise and Experience: People with Experiences of Using Services and Carers' Views of the Mental Capacity Act 2005]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm153v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Language Politics, Linguistic Capital and Bilingual Practitioners in Social Work]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm153v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Social workers have explored the role of language in communication, identity formation, meaning making and representation. However, they have rarely examined the political ramifications of <I>what</I> language is in use when discussing these roles, or how language operates as a form of differentially valued cultural capital that is an influential determinant of life chances. This article draws on an exploratory study carried out with eighteen bilingual practitioners residing in Australia who reflect on how language politics infiltrates their personal and professional identities. Although many informants viewed bilinguality as an asset for practice, they were equally aware of the influential position of English in both local and global contexts, its powers of exclusion, and its role in shaping social work knowledge. The article concludes that greater recognition needs to be given to these &lsquo;language politics&rsquo; in social work, especially in terms of recognizing how inequitable relations are maintained through the privileging of certain language practices and processes of linguistic othering.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harrison, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcm153</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Language Politics, Linguistic Capital and Bilingual Practitioners in Social Work]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm156v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Negotiating Foster-Families: Identification and Desire]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm156v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Riggs, D. W., Delfabbro, P. H., Augoustinos, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-02-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcm156</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Negotiating Foster-Families: Identification and Desire]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm149v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Community Anti-Poverty Strategies: A Conceptual Framework for a Critical Discussion]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm149v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Although communities are a recurring theme in poverty research and an essential component in anti-poverty strategies, the conceptualization of the link between communities and anti-poverty strategies has not been adequately addressed. The article argues that this inadequacy reflects the complexity of the construct. The difficulty in elaborating a more adequate conceptualization of the link between the &lsquo;community&rsquo; concept and the &lsquo;anti-poverty strategy&rsquo; construct derives from the discursive nature of the concepts of &lsquo;poverty&rsquo; and &lsquo;community&rsquo;. The discursive nature of the term &lsquo;community&rsquo; is mirrored in the ways in which the term is subject to multiple definitions, framed according different representations, affected by changing discourse, and interpreted by competing professional traditions of community practice. In addition to this complexity, the discursive character of the &lsquo;poverty&rsquo; concept, which is manifested in the lack of consensus surrounding the goals of anti-poverty strategies and the contentious ideological nature of poverty theories, make the task of reaching a common conceptualization of &lsquo;community anti-poverty strategy&rsquo; extremely difficult. The present article is based on a discourse analysis perspective and presents five analytical categories for a critical discussion of the concept. Moreover, it offers some practical recommendations that can guide social workers in developing strategies that better reflect the plights, desires and aspirations of communities living in poverty.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Strier, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcm149</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Community Anti-Poverty Strategies: A Conceptual Framework for a Critical Discussion]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm144v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Choosing Language: Social Service Framing and Social Justice]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm144v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Traditional social service language is embedded in an ideological framework that views individuals as the primary source of their predicaments and the solution to their problems, ignoring racism, poverty and other structural inequities. Stigmatizing language serves to maintain those inequities and reduce the collective sense of responsibility to address them. Social service providers who care about social justice, but do not understand the relationship between language and the larger social vision they want to help create, may unwittingly undermine their own project by reinforcing the language of hegemony.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vojak, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcm144</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Choosing Language: Social Service Framing and Social Justice]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm148v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Bullying of Lesbian and Gay Youth: A Qualitative Investigation]]></title>
<link>http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/bcm148v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The preponderance of bullying research does not address sexual orientation as a possible factor. The purpose of this study was to explore the perspectives of service providers and youth advocates working with lesbian and gay communities in order to increase understanding of bullying of lesbian and gay youth. In depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine key informants from various education and social service settings. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Inductive data analysis was conducted using a constant comparative method. Six major categories emerged: prevalence, sites and perpetrators, institutional and community factors, effects of bullying, and barriers as well as strategies to address bullying. Several dimensions of bullying that may be specific to lesbian and gay youth (e.g. pervasiveness across their social ecology and risks to coming-out; sexual prejudice in the media; and &lsquo;conversion bullying&rsquo;) suggest the importance of investigations to support development of targeted, multi-sectoral interventions.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mishna, F., Newman, P. A., Daley, A., Solomon, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcm148</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Bullying of Lesbian and Gay Youth: A Qualitative Investigation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Association of Social Workers</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>