BJSW Advance Access published online on October 16, 2007
British Journal of Social Work, doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcm120
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Social Policy, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. This article is based on a qualitative study of the relationships between professionals, parents and children in the context of childrens therapy after child sexual abuse. Specifically, the study took place in a therapeutic team in England that has developed various ways of involving parents in childrens therapy. One of the aims of the study was to develop an understanding of the complex triangular dynamics that result. In this article, concepts from discourse analysis are used to show how therapists talk about various types of cases. Therapy often follows a child protection enquiry and so professionals, parents and children must negotiate sensitive issues of blame and responsibility. Second, the article draws on sociological work on expertize to show how therapists employ interactional expertize as they combine their own expert view of the childs situation with the expertize held by the family, whilst being mindful of the imperatives of child protection. Only a successful resolution of these tensions can lead to a negotiated agreement over a plan for therapy for the child. It is suggested that this study highlights an example of the kind of interactional expertize that is well developed within social work and reflects its distinctive value base.
Article
Combining Professional Expertize and Service User Expertize: Negotiating Therapy for Sexually Abused Children
Andrew Hill 1 *
Andrew Hill, E-mail: ah37{at}york.ac.uk
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?