BJSW Advance Access published online on July 31, 2007
British Journal of Social Work, doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcm069
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Instructor at the Graduate School of Social Work, University of Applied Sciences of Central Switzerland, Werftstrasse 1, Postfach 3252, 6002 Luzern, Switzerland
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. There is a growing interest on the part of community groups, academics and funders in developing collaborative research projects between researchers and community groups. The authors of this paper collaborated with a community-based advocacy group on a study that focused on home repair problems faced by low-income homeowners in Philadelphia, PA (the Home Repair Study). In this article, we provide a critical analysis of the collaborative process between social work advocates and academic social work researchers based on participatory observation and in-depth interviews with those advocates who participated directly in the planning and implementation of the Home Repair Study. Similar to accounts provided in previously published articles, our findings suggest that such collaborations will frequently encounter tensions resulting from the different roles that researchers and community-based advocates fulfil in the research field and in the political arena. However, we argue that these tensions are healthy; if managed effectively, they contribute to more comprehensive research and more effective policy advocacy.
Article
Collaboration Between Community Advocates and Academic Researchers: Scientific Advocacy or Political Research?
Roland Stahl 1 * and Corey Shdaimah 2
2 Assistant Professor at the University of Maryland School of Social Work
Roland Stahl, E-mail: rstahl{at}brynmawr.edu
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?