BJSW Advance Access published online on July 26, 2007
British Journal of Social Work, doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcm048
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Senior Manager at Barnardos Australia and a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Western Sydney
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Information and communication technology (ICT) usage in contemporary child welfare practice reflects dominant managerial interests rather than those of the profession, and, importantly, of service users. Explicit use of ICT in the interests of service users remains embryonic, and professionals have been slow to capitalize on the communication potential of new technologies. This contrasts with technology uptake in other areas of human services. Unless this situation changes, client participation and power may decline further and managerial interests increasingly dominate. ICT has the potential to strengthen interaction between families and workers and change the conditions of initiation, distribution and use of spoken and written texts in social work practice. This could significantly affect the ability of service users to be heard and to influence decision making. However, the opportunities and limitations of computer-mediated communication are a relatively new area of study—their application to child welfare requires considerable care. Social workers should explore the advantages that ICT offers service users and challenge the digital divide which still affects significant pockets of service users, and reflect on our own role in this. Here, we ask why social work has been has been slow to capitalize on new approaches to its core business: communication.
Article
Child Welfare and Information and Communication Technology: Todays Challenge
Susan Tregeagle 1 and Michael Darcy 2 *
2 Acting Director of the Social Justice Social Change Research Centre at the University of Western Sydney
Michael Darcy, E-mail: m.darcy{at}uws.edu.au
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Rafferty and J. Steyaert Editorial Br. J. Soc. Work, June 1, 2009; 39(4): 589 - 598. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
