Skip Navigation



BJSW Advance Access published online on April 18, 2007
British Journal of Social Work, doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcm025
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/6/1115    most recent
bcm025v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rapaport, J.
Right arrow Articles by Manthorpe, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers. All rights reserved

Article

Family Matters: Developments Concerning the Role of the Nearest Relative and Social Worker under Mental Health Law in England and Wales

Joan Rapaport 1 * and Jill Manthorpe 2

1 Social Care Workforce Research Unit, King’s College London, Strand Campus, London WC2R 2LS, UK
2 Professor of Social Work at King’s College London and Director of the Social Care Workforce Research Unit

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Joan Rapaport, E-mail: joan.rapaport{at}kcl.ac.uk


  Abstract

The ‘nearest relative’ and social work roles in mental health services share common ground. Although the social worker is a trained professional and the nearest relative is identified from a fixed hierarchy of kin, both roles were awarded the authority to make a compulsory order for hospital admission of a person with serious mental disorder warranting detention in hospital. Both roles will alter if amendments to the 1983 Mental Health Act in England and Wales come into force. This article considers the changing roles of relatives, carers and practitioners in the context of policy shifts in mental health legislation and services in England and Wales. Drawing on the interlinked tenets of anti-discriminatory and anti-oppressive practice, it presents an analysis of the interlocking powers of the nearest relative and the Approved Social Worker, and an overview of defunct and existing legal proposals. The article concludes that the lay and professional roles remain in flux but they are still interdependent in many instances. Note: The term ‘patient’ is used to describe a person who is detained or liable to be detained under the 1983 Mental Health Act. The term ‘service user’ is used to describe someone who uses mental health services. However, the authors acknowledge that both descriptors are problematic given the stigma associated with the term ‘patient’ and possible offence caused by defining people by the services they use. The terms are used to reflect the legal status implied and no prejudicial meanings or interpretations are intended.

Keywords: mental health, law, policy, nearest relative, carers, approved social worker.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J Soc WorkHome page
J. Campbell
Deciding to Detain: The Use of Compulsory Mental Health Law by UK Social Workers
Br. J. Soc. Work, November 5, 2009; (2009) bcp121v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J Soc WorkHome page
G. Davidson and J. Campbell
An Audit of Assessment and Reporting by Approved Social Workers (ASWs)
Br. J. Soc. Work, May 23, 2009; (2009) bcp060v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.