Skip Navigation



BJSW Advance Access published online on March 17, 2007
British Journal of Social Work, doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcm016
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
37/3/387    most recent
bcm016v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers. All rights reserved

Article

Increasing User Choice or Privatizing Risk? The Antinomies of Personalization

Iain Ferguson 1 *

1 Senior Lecturer in Department of Applied Social Science, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Iain Ferguson, E-mail: iain.ferguson{at}stir.ac.uk


  Abstract

Within a very short space of time, the concept of personalization has come to occupy a central place within dominant social work and adult care discourses within the UK. Through an analysis of one influential model of personalization, this paper will explore the factors behind the concept’s current popularity. I shall argue that this popularity is due primarily to its congruence with key themes of New Labour thought, including individualization, responsibilization and the transfer of risk from the state to the individual. I shall conclude that, given its acceptance of the marketization of social work and social care, its neglect of issues of poverty and inequality, its flawed conception of the people who use social work services, its potentially stigmatizing view of welfare dependency and its potential for promoting, rather than challenging, the deprofessionalization of social work, the philosophy of personalization is not one that social workers should accept uncritically.

Keywords: personalization, consumerism, responsibilization, deprofessionalization.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J Soc WorkHome page
J. Burton and D. van den Broek
Accountable and Countable: Information Management Systems and the Bureaucratization of Social Work
Br. J. Soc. Work, April 26, 2008; (2008) bcn027v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.