Skip Navigation



BJSW Advance Access published online on March 7, 2007
British Journal of Social Work, doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcm013
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
37/3/405    most recent
bcm013v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ellis, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers. All rights reserved

Article

Direct Payments and Social Work Practice: The Significance of ‘Street-Level Bureaucracy’ in Determining Eligibility

Kathryn Ellis 1 *

1 Department of Applied Social Studies, University of Bedfordshire, Park Square, Luton LU1 3JU, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Kathryn Ellis, E-mail: kathryn.ellis{at}beds.ac.uk


  Abstract

Sponsored both by governments intent upon fiscal restraint and user movements keen to extend choice and control, ‘cash-for-care’ schemes are replacing direct services across mature welfare states. Recent legislation on direct payments, which has enacted the UK version of cash-for-care, has attracted considerable research interest in the UK. Previous studies point to a number of tensions for social workers in the implementation process which give rise, in turn, to considerable uncertainty, even hostility, on the part of front line staff. This article, which discusses the findings of a study of assessment and care management practice in one English council, seeks to make sense of social workers’ approach to the allocation of direct payments by reference to Lipsky’s (1980) theory of ‘street-level bureaucracy’. The author concludes that despite ten years of managerialism, in the course of which professional practice has been routinized and regulated, Lipsky’s work is still useful in analysing front line behaviour around direct payments.

Keywords: direct payments, professional values, ‘street-level bureaucracy’.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J Soc WorkHome page
J. Manthorpe, S. Jacobs, J. Rapaport, D. Challis, A. Netten, C. Glendinning, M. Stevens, M. Wilberforce, M. Knapp, and J. Harris
Training for Change: Early Days of Individual Budgets and the Implications for Social Work and Care Management Practice: A Qualitative Study of the Views of Trainers
Br. J. Soc. Work, October 1, 2009; 39(7): 1291 - 1305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J Soc WorkHome page
P. Rabiee, N. Moran, and C. Glendinning
Individual Budgets: Lessons from Early Users' Experiences
Br. J. Soc. Work, July 1, 2009; 39(5): 918 - 935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J Soc WorkHome page
M. Stevens, J. Manthorpe, S. Martineau, S. Hussein, J. Rapaport, and J. Harris
Making Decisions about Who Should Be Barred from Working with Adults in Vulnerable Situations: The Need for Social Work Understanding
Br. J. Soc. Work, October 1, 2008; (2008) bcn135v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.