Skip Navigation



BJSW Advance Access published online on March 2, 2007
British Journal of Social Work, doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcl396
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/6/1100    most recent
bcl396v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lovat, T.
Right arrow Articles by Gray, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers. All rights reserved

Article

Towards a Proportionist Social Work Ethics: A Habermasian Perspective

Terence Lovat 1 * and Mel Gray 2

1 Pro Vice-Chancellor of the Faculty of Education and Arts and Professor of Education at the University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
2 Professor of Social Work at the University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Terence Lovat, E-mail: Terry.Lovat{at}newcastle.edu.au


  Abstract

In this paper, we offer an innovative alternative to the deontological and utilitarian approaches which tend to dominate social work ethics, instead proposing a proportionist ethics drawing on the work of Jürgen Habermas. Flyvberg (1998) claims that Habermas ‘distanced himself from phronesis and neo-Aristotelianism’, both of which he is purported to have ‘rhetorically . . . associated with neo-conservatism’ (p. 225) and Varela (1992) places Habermas squarely in the Kantian tradition. In this paper, we present an alternative interpretation of Habermas’s ethical stance, which is based on our perception of him as a keen observer of and commentator on modern life, not least about human intersubjective relations and communication, and our practical attempts to deal with the intractable problems of difference in an increasingly pluralistic world. Moreover, we see a form of proportionist thinking in Habermas which suggests a close alignment with Aristotelianism and, indeed, Thomism. For social work, an approach of this sort seems particularly urgent as the field tends increasingly towards, on the one hand, technological, rule bound, deontological frameworks, such as codes of ethics and ethics audits (Reamer, 2001) and, on the other hand, ideologically based ethics of care approaches, both of which tend to stultification and obstruction of the practical action appropriate to the age.

Keywords: Habermas, proportionism, social work ethics, ethical theory, virtue ethics.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J Soc WorkHome page
M. Gray
Moral Sources and Emergent Ethical Theories in Social Work
Br. J. Soc. Work, September 22, 2009; (2009) bcp104v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.