Skip Navigation



BJSW Advance Access published online on July 24, 2006
British Journal of Social Work, doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcl079
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
37/7/1263    most recent
bcl079v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McLaughlin, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers. All rights reserved

Article

Regulation and Risk in Social Work: The General Social Care Council and the Social Care Register in Context

Kenneth McLaughlin 1 *

1 Senior lecturer in social work at Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M20 5WB, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Kenneth McLaughlin, E-mail: K.McLaughlin{at}mmu.ac.uk


  Abstract

The 2000 Care Standards Act led to the setting up the General Social Care Council (GSCC) as the new governing professional body for social workers and other social care employees in England.1 The GSCC published national Codes of Practice for social care staff and their employers in 2002, whilst 1 April 2003 saw the introduction of the Social Care Register. The stated aim of these developments is to protect the public, improve the quality of care offered by social workers and increase public confidence in the profession. However, such intentions disguise the increase in regulatory control that the GSCC and social care employers have gained over the workforce--intrusions that have met relatively little criticism. By locating these developments within a broader social context, one in which risk and its management are at the forefront of contemporary social policy and practice, this paper argues that underlying the debate is a climate of fear and distrust in which there is a tendency to view people as either vulnerable, dangerous or both. Such a degraded view of the subjects of social work also pertains to social workers themselves, who are simultaneously seen as assessors of risk, at risk and as a risk.

Keywords: risk, regulation, vulnerability.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of SociologyHome page
K. Healy
A case of mistaken identity: The social welfare professions and New Public Management
Journal of Sociology, December 1, 2009; 45(4): 401 - 418.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J Soc WorkHome page
K. Popple
Editorial
Br. J. Soc. Work, November 19, 2009; (2009) bcp123v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Social WorkHome page
P. M. Garrett
Marx and `Modernization': Reading Capital as Social Critique and Inspiration for Social Work Resistance to Neoliberalization
Journal of Social Work, April 1, 2009; 9(2): 199 - 221.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J Soc WorkHome page
K. McLaughlin
The Social Worker versus the General Social Care Council: An Analysis of Care Standards Tribunal Hearings and Decisions
Br. J. Soc. Work, October 4, 2008; (2008) bcn136v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J Soc WorkHome page
M. Stevens, J. Manthorpe, S. Martineau, S. Hussein, J. Rapaport, and J. Harris
Making Decisions about Who Should Be Barred from Working with Adults in Vulnerable Situations: The Need for Social Work Understanding
Br. J. Soc. Work, October 1, 2008; (2008) bcn135v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.