Skip Navigation



BJSW Advance Access published online on July 19, 2006
British Journal of Social Work, doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcl063
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
37/7/1189    most recent
bcl063v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Priestley, M.
Right arrow Articles by Mercer, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers. All rights reserved

Article

Direct Payments and Disabled People in the UK: Supply, Demand and Devolution

Mark Priestley 1 *, Debbie Jolly 2, Charlotte Pearson 3, Sheila Ridell 4, Colin Barnes 5, and Geof Mercer 6

1 Reader in Disability Studies, and Pro-dean for Research in the Faculty of Education, Social Sciences and Law, at the University of Leeds
2 Research Officer at the Centre for Disability Studies, University of Leeds
3 Lecturer in the Department of Urban Studies, University of Glasgow
4 Professor of Inclusion and Diversity at the Centre for Research in Education, Inclusion and Diversity at the University of Edinburgh
5 Professor of Disability Studies and Director of the Centre for Disability Studies, University of Leeds
6 Reader in Disability Policy and Research at the Centre for Disability Studies, University of Leeds

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mark Priestley, E-mail: m.a.priestley{at}leeds.ac.uk


  Abstract

Direct payments have brought new opportunities for self-determination and independent living to disabled people in the UK, featuring prominently in government strategy and the 2006 White Paper, ‘Our Health, Our Care, Our Say’. However, ten years after direct payments legislation, take-up remains low and implementation varies greatly. Rates of take-up in England remain more than double those in other parts of the UK, raising questions about devolution and equity. This paper presents data from a national study to examine some of the mechanisms underlying uneven outcomes for disabled people in different parts of the United Kingdom, with particular reference to the politics of devolved governance. The analysis focuses on scope for interpretations of policy; resources for information and training; the impact of mandatory duties and targets; extensions to new user groups; and the role of support organizations and disability activism. The evidence suggests that local variations have been produced not only by ‘local’ factors, but also by different opportunity structures for policy development in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. This raises questions about the impact of devolution on equity and opportunity for disabled people in the UK.

Keywords: disability, policy implementation, direct payments, devolution.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.