Skip Navigation



BJSW Advance Access published online on November 30, 2005
British Journal of Social Work, doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch392
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/7/1085    most recent
bch392v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gibbs, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mullen, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers. All rights reserved.

Article

Community Treatment Orders for People with Serious Mental Illness: A New Zealand Study

Anita Gibbs 1 *, John Dawson 2, and Richard Mullen 3

1 Social worker at Bristol University
2 Professor of Law at the University of Otago in Dunedin, New Zealand
3 Senior lecturer in the department of psychological medicine at the University of Otago

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Anita Gibbs, E-mail: anita.gibbs{at}stonebow.otago.ac.nz


  Abstract

New Zealand legislation allows for the involuntary outpatient treatment of people with serious mental illness. This study examines the views of service users, family members and mental health professionals (MHPs) about the impact of this regime. Semi-structured interviews were completed with forty-two service users, twenty-seven family members and ninety MHPs, with recent experience of the regime. Participants were asked to comment on the functions of community treatment (or non-resident) orders, their benefits and restrictions, decisions about their termination and any impact on relationships. Most service users believed the main purpose of the order was to ensure they took medication. They also believed the order provided better access to other treatments, supported accommodation and care from MHPs. Families considered the orders provided relief for them and a supportive structure for their relative’s care. MHPs found the orders useful for engaging service users in a continuing therapeutic relationship, and for promoting treatment adherence. In each group, a majority of those interviewed viewed involuntary community treatment in a generally positive light, while acknowledging the restrictions imposed on service users’ freedom.

Keywords: community treatment orders, outpatient commitment, mental health, service user.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.