Skip Navigation



BJSW Advance Access published online on November 22, 2005
British Journal of Social Work, doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch383
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/7/1209    most recent
bch383v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bowes, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sim, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers. All rights reserved.

Article

Advocacy for Black and Minority Ethnic Communities: Understandings and Expectations

Alison Bowes 1 * and Duncan Sim 2

1 Professor of Sociology in the Department of Applied Social Science, University of Stirling
2 Senior Lecturer in Housing Studies in the Department of Applied Social Science, University of Stirling

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Alison Bowes, E-mail: a.m.bowes{at}stir.ac.uk


  Abstract

Recent policy has promoted ‘advocacy’ as a means of promoting social justice for many disadvantaged groups. Yet ‘advocacy’ is a contested concept, and the understandings that members of disadvantaged groups themselves have of advocacy have rarely been explored. Previous research indicates that understandings may vary considerably. Using empirical evidence from research conducted in Glasgow, Scotland, this paper examines the understandings and expectations of ‘advocacy’ held by black and minority ethnic (BME) service providers and potential service users. The BME service providers believed that they were offering advocacy, and did so in the context of a marginalized position for their services. The BME community members supported the development of advocacy services, but their own marginalization was in many ways reinforced by services they were already using. They had clear ideas about appropriate advocacy services for their situation. These ideas were grounded in their current situation, and did not necessarily conform to dominant ideas about advocacy. In conclusion, the prospects for successful advocacy are assessed.

Keywords: advocacy, black and minority ethnic groups, refugees and asylum seekers.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 The Counseling PsychologistHome page
L. A. Goodman, C. Glenn, A. Bohlig, V. Banyard, and A. Borges
Feminist Relational Advocacy: Processes and Outcomes From the Perspective of Low-Income Women With Depression
The Counseling Psychologist, August 1, 2009; 37(6): 848 - 876.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.