Skip Navigation



BJSW Advance Access published online on October 3, 2005

British Journal of Social Work, doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch251
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/2/227    most recent
bch251v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, I. F.
Right arrow Articles by Mullender, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers. All rights reserved.

Article

Recognizing Social Work

Ian F. Shaw 1*, Hilary Arksey 2, and Audrey Mullender 3

1 Professor of Social Work at the University of York, England
2 Research Fellow in the Social Policy Research Unit at the University of York
3 Principal of Ruskin College Oxford and holds a Chair in Social Work at the University of Warwick

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Ian F. Shaw, E-mail: ifs2{at}york.ac.uk


   Abstract

There has been little interest until recently in the question of whether social work has the characteristics of an academic discipline. This article offers a synopsis of issues arising from a review of social work and social care research funded through the Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE). Following a brief scene setting, the first main section of the article gives a synopsis of the social work and social care community’s experience and judgements regarding their engagement with the research council. In the second part of the article, we review relevant policies, structures and trends from an ESRC and social science perspective. We focus on the development of research programmes, followed by an outline of the delivery and implementation of programmes. In the final section, we review the issues, themes and directions that emerged from the project. These include judgements of research relevance, research users, research utilization, the social work contribution to the development of research methods, inter-disciplinary research, the question of whether there are distinctive attributes of social work research, research capacity, career building, priority setting, and the outcomes of social work funding bids. We also reflect on the development and delivery of research programmes, and the implications of the invisibility of social work research within the ESRC. Disciplines within universities are not fixed and abiding realities. ‘Recognizing’ social work is a dynamic, socially negotiated process, shaped by the construction and ordering of knowledge claims within social work and social science communities, and reflecting power differentials that are mediated through structural mechanisms that tend to exclude new ‘claimants’ such as social work. We include a number of recommendations, and suggest ways in which the issues may have relevance beyond the UK.

Keywords: social science, ESRC, social work, research, discipline.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qualitative InquiryHome page
I. Shaw
Rereading The Jack-Roller: Hidden Histories in Sociology and Social Work
Qualitative Inquiry, July 1, 2009; 15(7): 1241 - 1264.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br J Soc WorkHome page
P. Bywaters
Learning from Experience: Developing a Research Strategy for Social Work in the UK
Br. J. Soc. Work, July 1, 2008; 38(5): 936 - 952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.