BJSW Advance Access originally published online on March 7, 2007
British Journal of Social Work 2007 37(3):405-422; doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcm013
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct Payments and Social Work Practice: The Significance of ‘Street-Level Bureaucracy’ in Determining Eligibility
Kathryn Ellis is Principal Lecturer in Applied Social Studies at the University of Bedfordshire. She worked in disability organizations within the voluntary sector before taking up employment in higher education. She has researched and written extensively on needs assessment, social work and social care.
Correspondence to Kathryn Ellis, Department of Applied Social Studies, University of Bedfordshire, Park Square, Luton LU1 3JU, UK. E-mail: kathryn.ellis{at}beds.ac.uk
Sponsored both by governments intent upon fiscal restraint and user movements keen to extend choice and control, ‘cash-for-care’ schemes are replacing direct services across mature welfare states. Recent legislation on direct payments, which has enacted the UK version of cash-for-care, has attracted considerable research interest in the UK. Previous studies point to a number of tensions for social workers in the implementation process which give rise, in turn, to considerable uncertainty, even hostility, on the part of front line staff. This article, which discusses the findings of a study of assessment and care management practice in one English council, seeks to make sense of social workers’ approach to the allocation of direct payments by reference to Lipsky’s (1980) theory of ‘street-level bureaucracy’. The author concludes that despite ten years of managerialism, in the course of which professional practice has been routinized and regulated, Lipsky’s work is still useful in analysing front line behaviour around direct payments.
Keywords: direct payments, professional values, ‘street-level bureaucracy’
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Stevens, J. Manthorpe, S. Martineau, S. Hussein, J. Rapaport, and J. Harris Making Decisions about Who Should Be Barred from Working with Adults in Vulnerable Situations: The Need for Social Work Understanding Br. J. Soc. Work, October 1, 2008; (2008) bcn135v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Rabiee, N. Moran, and C. Glendinning Individual Budgets: Lessons from Early Users' Experiences Br. J. Soc. Work, March 17, 2008; (2008) bcm152v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Manthorpe, S. Jacobs, J. Rapaport, D. Challis, A. Netten, C. Glendinning, M. Stevens, M. Wilberforce, M. Knapp, and J. Harris Training for Change: Early Days of Individual Budgets and the Implications for Social Work and Care Management Practice: A Qualitative Study of the Views of Trainers Br. J. Soc. Work, March 7, 2008; (2008) bcn017v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|