Skip Navigation



BJSW Advance Access published online on November 3, 2009

British Journal of Social Work, doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcp124
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmid, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers. All rights reserved.

A History of the Present: Uncovering Discourses in (South African) Child Welfare

Jeanette Schmid

Jeanette Schmid is a social worker with experience in South Africa, Canada and Switzerland in a variety of fields including child welfare, early childhood intervention, trauma, disability and justice. She recently completed her doctorate focused on South African child welfare. Her interests include child welfare, international social work, im/migration and social policy issues.

Correspondence to Jeanette Schmid, Wasserfallenstrasse 7a, 5417 Untersiggenthal, Aargau, Switzerland. Email: jeabry{at}gmail.com


   Abstract

Foucault's analytical methods of archaeology and genealogy reveal that South African child welfare thinking cannot be clearly divided into an apartheid and post-apartheid epoch. Rather, this history of the present identifies that a Child Protection discourse continues to dominate current child welfare legislation and policies, both at a state and an agency level, even while the language of a Developmental Social Welfare discourse is utilised. The dominance of the Child Protection discourse allows service users and service providers to be constructed in such a way that maintains the use of an intrusive, individualistic approach to child welfare that effectively overlooks the impact of structural factors on the lives of vulnerable children and their families. Archaeology and genealogy provide valuable tools for uncovering the dominant and marginalised discourses and for analyzing the circulation of power within a particular child welfare system.

Keywords: Child welfare, genealogy, developmental social welfare


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.