Skip Navigation



BJSW Advance Access published online on October 14, 2009

British Journal of Social Work, doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcp105
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leece, J.
Right arrow Articles by Peace, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers. All rights reserved.

Developing New Understandings of Independence and Autonomy in the Personalised Relationship

Janet Leece and Sheila Peace

Correspondence to Janet Leece, 10 The Glade, Westbury Park, Clayton, Newcastle, Staffordshire ST5 4NG, UK. E-mail: Dleece{at}aol.com


   Abstract

The personalisation of adult social care has the potential to create support that is individualised, and it is the reality of this support relationship that forms the basis of this article. To date, there have been few studies that focus on the association between care users and their workers. Here, we consider research from a Ph.D. study that allows for comparison between two sets of relationships: between disabled adults and homecare workers employed by a local authority, and between disabled adults using direct payments to employ their own personal assistants. The research pays attention to the meanings attached to the concepts of independence and autonomy, with a model of autonomy applied to aid clarity and develop our understanding of complexities in support relationships. The research uses a grounded theory approach with qualitative interviews of matched samples of respondents, providing new evidence about the personalised relationship. Based on the research, we argue that direct employment of support workers appears to facilitate greater autonomy for disabled adults than traditional homecare relationships. However, the research goes on to suggest that greater autonomy for disabled adults may have a downside for support workers.

Keywords: Personalisation, autonomy, independence, care relationships, direct payments, personal assistants, homecare


Dr Janet Leece is a registered social worker who has worked in social care for many years, as a social work practitioner and, later, a commissioning officer. She is also an honorary research fellow at Staffordshire University. Janet has published extensively in the area of direct payments, including the Practitioner's Guide to Direct Payments, published by Venture Press, and a co-edited book, Developments in Direct Payments, published by Policy Press in 2006. Professor Sheila Peace is currently Associate Dean (Research) as well as Professor of Social Gerontology in the Faculty of Health and Social Care at The Open University. She is a member of the Centre for Ageing and Biographical Studies, and has a long-term interest in the field of environment and ageing. Sheila has undertaken research on the quality of life in care settings, the context of care across the life-course, and the regulation of social care services for older people. A member of the Executive Committee of the British Society of Gerontology, Sheila's recent publications include: Environment and Identity in Later Life, published by Open University Press in 2005, and the co-edited book, Ageing in Society, published by Sage in 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.