Skip Navigation



BJSW Advance Access published online on November 6, 2008

British Journal of Social Work, doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcn144
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fenge, L.-A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers. All rights reserved

Striving towards Inclusive Research: An Example of Participatory Action Research with Older Lesbians and Gay Men

Lee-Ann Fenge

Lee-Ann Fenge is a senior lecturer in social work at Bournemouth University. Her teaching and research interests include working with older people, participatory methodologies and social exclusion in education. The Gay and Grey research project referred to in this paper was funded for three years by the Big Lottery Fund, and was a joint project between Bournemouth University and Help and Care, a voluntary agency working with older people and their carers in Bournemouth.

Correspondence to Lee-Ann Fenge, School of Health and Social Care, Bournemouth University, Room R709, Royal London House, Christchurch Road, Bournemouth BH1 3LT, UK. E-mail: lfenge{at}bournemouth.ac.uk


   Abstract

This paper sets out to explore the implications of participatory action research (PAR) as a method of encouraging older people from minority groups to have a ‘voice’ in defining knowledge, theory and practice about their lives. Recent policy in Britain has promoted the recognition of diversity of experience in later life (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, 2006) and the importance of working with older people as equal partners (Audit Commission, 2004). At the same time, notions of partnership and service user involvement in both research and practice development are now firmly established within health and social care practice. Despite this, the needs of older lesbians and gay men are still very much invisible within mainstream policy and practice (Heaphy et al., 2004). PAR approaches seek to address issues of power, politics and empowerment (Bradbury and Reason, 2001) and therefore offers an inclusive method of working with marginalized and excluded voices. This is important in research with minority groups, as their experiences can be masked by imposing mainstream categories and assumptions (Pollner and Rosenfeld, 2000). The paper considers participatory action research as a methodology for inclusive social work research and uses a case study to explore the methodology. It reviews the ‘cycle’ of research using the six principles for working with disempowered groups identified by Whitmore and McGee (2001). The paradoxes involved in participatory research are explored, including issues of inclusiveness and exclusivity, and the possibility of ‘untold truths’ (Lundy and McGovern, 2006). The challenges involved in striving for inclusive and empowering research methodologies are discussed, exploring the implications for ‘outsider’ researchers, and the challenges of working with ‘variant truths’.

Keywords: Participatory action research, older lesbians and gay men, inclusive practice, variant truths


This is a ‘work in progress’. Do not cite without the expressed permission of the author.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.