BJSW Advance Access published online on April 11, 2008
British Journal of Social Work, doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcn054
Communication, Recognition and Social Work: Aligning the Ethical Theories of Habermas and Honneth
The author has worked for over twenty years in child and family social work in Belfast as a practitioner and manager. His academic interests lie in applying critical social theory to social work practice. He is currently Senior Lecturer at the School of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work, Queens University, Belfast
Correspondence to Stan Houston, School of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work, Queen's University Belfast, 6 College Park, Belfast BT7 1LP, UK. Email: s.houston{at}qub.ac.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
The modern world is replete with ethical challenges of Orwellian proportions. The violation of human rights and misrecognition of identities are two of the most pressing examples. In this paper, the ethical theories of Habermas and Honneth are aligned as a way of addressing these specific challenges within social work. It is suggested that these theories are complementary, mutually rectifying and concordant at the meta-ethical level of analysis. The alignment is also justified, pragmatically, through the construction of three hypothetical vignettes demonstrating different kinds of practice dilemmas. The need for egalitarian communication and the imperative to recognize human identity in all its dimensions subsequently emerge as the two foundation stones for ethical deliberation in social work.
Keywords: Ethics, critical social theory, communication, identity