Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MEANS, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© British Association of Social Workers

Which Way For ‘Radical’ Social Work?

ROBIN MEANS

Robin Means graduated in social administration at Nottingham University and then carried out three years postgraduate research on local authority community work at the Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, Birmingham, for which he obtained a Ph.D. This was followed by a year as a trainee social worker in a local authority before going on the social work course at Warwick University.

Summary

This paper attempts to show that ‘radical’ social work needs to develop a more sophisticated analysis of the conflict between social work clients and the ‘conforming’ working class. The ‘radical’ literature is criticized for tending to locate the origin of such conflict in the socialization experiences of the latter group. It is argued that the basis of conflict can often lie in the competition for scarce resources in a market economy and this is illustrated by reference to housing struggles in the redevelopment areas of a large Midlands city. Social work support for client deviance may serve to worsen such divisions unless more ways are found to link up different sections of the working class.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
J. Hearn
Radical Social Work- Contradictions, Limitations and Political Possibilities
Critical Social Policy, June 1, 1982; 2(4): 19 - 34.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.