Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HOLMAN, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© British Association of Social Workers

The Place of Fostering in Social Work

ROBERT HOLMAN

Dr. Robert Holman was a Child Care Officer before teaching at Stevcnage College of Further Education and the University of Birmingham. He has been involved in a number of community activities and is a member of the Gulbenkian Working Group on Community Work. His most recent publication is Trading in Children: A Study of Private Fostering (Routledge sect; Kegan Paul, 1973). By the time this article is published he will have left Glasgow University and taken up his appointment as Professor of Social Administration at the University of Bath

Summary

To foster children is no longer regarded as the main objective of the child care services. However, fostering is once again a matter of social work and public debate. The paper explains that more types of children are now being assessed as requiring fostering at a time when social service departments are finding it difficult to expand their number of foster homes. This greater demand for foster homes coincides with recent researches which help to clarify the nature of fostering. Accordingly, a distinction can be made between 'exclusive' and 'inclusive' fosterings. It is considered that a conflict exists between popularity of exclusive fostering and research findings which stress the value of inclusive fostering. Research is also identifying the contribution which social workers can make in the fostering field. But the desired inputs of training, low caseloads and staff stability pose problems for social work management. Finally, the research findings discussed in the paper are used to argue that the forthcoming Children Bill is not only based on false assumptions about the behaviour of natural parents but will also promote exclusive rather than inclusive fosterings. A plea is made that child welfare policy be seen in a larger context of social reform


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J Soc WorkHome page
D. Kirton, J. Beecham, and K. Ogilvie
Gaining Satisfaction? An Exploration of Foster-Carers' Attitudes to Payment
Br. J. Soc. Work, October 1, 2007; 37(7): 1205 - 1224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
International Social WorkHome page
A. Mosek
Well-being and parental contact of foster children in Israel: a different situation from the USA?
International Social Work, January 1, 1993; 36(3): 261 - 275.
[PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.