Skip Navigation


BJSW Advance Access originally published online on January 27, 2008
British Journal of Social Work 2008 38(5):953-970; doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcm128
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
38/5/953    most recent
bcm128v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, I.
Right arrow Articles by Norton, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers. All rights reserved.

Kinds and Quality of Social Work Research

Ian Shaw and Matthew Norton

Ian Shaw is Professor of Social Work, University of York, England.

Matthew Norton is a Doctoral Student in the Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of York, England.

Correspondence to Ian Shaw, Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK. E-mail: ifs2{at}york.ac.uk


  Abstract

This paper, drawing on a study of social work research in UK universities, asks—and suggests provisional answers to—two questions. First, is it possible to identify ways to categorize the kinds of research in social work in a form that recognizes and respects the aims and values of social work? Second, assuming we ought to do so, in what ways should the quality of social work research be assessed? In response to examination of output from the 2001 RAE, a national workshop and several focus groups, we developed a classification of kinds of research according to two different dimensions: On whom is the primary substantive focus of the research? What is the primary problem focus of the research? In terms of assessing quality, we believe that the social work community should not be aiming for precise standards. We recommend a ‘fitness for purpose’, which should include guidance on how different stakeholder communities should apply quality judgments. However, while all stakeholders should sign up to the broad dimensions and standards, their application should always leave scope for flexibility and local relevance. Quality should be based on justification of both inner and outer science considerations.

Keywords: quality, social work research, audit, applied research


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.