Skip Navigation


BJSW Advance Access originally published online on July 19, 2006
British Journal of Social Work 2007 37(6):1079-1094; doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcl080
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
37/6/1079    most recent
bcl080v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horder, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers. All rights reserved.

‘Reading’ in Professional Practice: How Social Work Practice Assessors Access Knowledge and Information

William Horder

William Horder is a Lecturer in Social Work at Goldsmiths College, University of London.

Correspondence to William Horder, PACE, Goldsmiths College, New Cross, London SE14 6NW, UK. E-mail: w.horder{at}gold.ac.uk

This paper presents the results of a survey of the reading habits of 184 social work practice teachers/assessors in 2005. New technology has transformed the availability of information, but in the UK, social workers, from whom Practice Assessors are drawn, have been found to have relatively poor access to electronic resources. The literature also highlights deficits in social workers’ reading, but suggests that there is a strong oral tradition which may compensate for this. The survey aimed to show the choices this group of staff makes between different media and different types of knowledge. It was found that oral sources were the most used resource, but that habits of internet use were also very well developed. Respondents’ reading, and particularly their use of the internet, appeared to be strongly influenced by organizational priorities and statutory roles. Clinical and therapeutic texts and specialist knowledge were also important to respondents. Books and journals were highly valued but cost was in many cases a barrier to access. Findings from this survey suggest that Practice Assessors are a relatively well resourced group and that the internet is of great importance as a source of information for them.

Keywords: professional reading, internet, practice learning, evidence-based practice, continuing professional development


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.