BJSW Advance Access originally published online on June 19, 2006
British Journal of Social Work 2007 37(6):1059-1077; doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcl053
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment Frameworks: A Critical Reflection
Beth R. Crisp is Associate Professor in Social Work at Deakin University in Australia, and formerly Senior Lecturer in Social Work at the University of Glasgow. She has written widely in the areas of social work education and research, and is particularly interested in evidence based practice and programme evaluation.
Mark R. Anderson was employed as a researcher on this project at the University of Glasgow. He is now the research grants officer at RMIT University in Australia.
Joan Orme is Professor of Social Work at the Glasgow School of Social Work. She has written on many aspects of social work education, practice and research.
Dr Pam Green Lister is a Senior lecturer in Social Work at the Glasgow School of Social Work and has undertaken research in the fields of social work pedagogy and child protection.
Correspondence to Associate Professor Beth R. Crisp, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Waterfront Campus, Geelong, Victoria, Australia 3217. E-mail: beth.crisp{at}deakin.edu.au
Increasing widespread requirements that assessment practice conforms to generic guidelines contained in assessment frameworks has been contentious and critiques offered on individual frameworks have been assumed to apply to the concept of assessment frameworks more generally. After comparing four assessment frameworks currently being used in the UK, this paper argues that although some generalizations can be made, for the most part, they are highly individual documents in terms of range and depth of content, the extent to which they are evidenced and the quality of that evidence and implicit expectations as to the skill bases of assessors. Furthermore, the introduction of assessment frameworks is not in itself a panacea to ensure good practice. Even with the most comprehensive frameworks, social workers will still need comprehensive training in assessment and supervision of their practice.
Keywords: assessment frameworks, practice guidance, professional practice, social work assessment
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Kemshall Risk Rationalities in Contemporary Social Work Policy and Practice Br. J. Soc. Work, January 4, 2010; (2010) bcp157v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Orme 'Eric Sainsbury' Qualitative Social Work, September 1, 2009; 8(3): 409 - 414. [PDF] |
||||

