BJSW Advance Access originally published online on February 20, 2006
British Journal of Social Work 2006 36(7):1101-1118; doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch423
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
International Perspectives on the Use of Community Treatment Orders: Implications for Mental Health Social Workers
Jim Campbell is a Senior Lecturer at the School of Social Work, Queens University Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Lisa Brophy is Chief Social Worker at the NorthWest Area Mental Health Service, Melbourne, Australia, and a Ph.D. student at the School of Social Work, The University of Melbourne.
Bill Healy is an Associate Professor at the School of Social Work and Social Policy, LaTrobe University Melbourne and NorthWestern Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Ann Marie O’Brien is Community Treatment Coordinator at the Royal Ottawa Hospital, Ontario, Canada.
Correspondence to Dr Jim Campbell, Senior Lecturer, School of Social Work, Queens University Belfast, 7 Lennoxvale, BT9 5BY, Northern Ireland. E-mail: jim.campbell{at}qub.ac.uk
Substantial changes to mental health law and policy have occurred throughout the Western world during the last decade. The drift towards control, particularly in the form of Community Treatment Orders (CTOs), has profound implications for the role of mental health social workers, yet this issue is rarely discussed in academic literature. This paper seeks to redress this gap in knowledge by examining aspects of law, policy and practice using three case studies: Victoria, Australia; Ontario, Canada; and regions of the UK. The paper begins by critically reviewing selected literature on CTOs, revealing competing claims about efficacy and their impact upon service users1 and practitioners. A discussion of policy and practice contexts in the three jurisdictions is then presented and supported with a typology, to illustrate contrasts and comparisons. In their conclusions, the authors assert that mental health social workers often have a crucial part to play in the implementation of CTOs but that this is not always acknowledged in law and organizational policy. Social workers’ roles and responsibilities need to be more explicitly identified in mental health law. At the same time, there should be a continuing debate about how such coercive powers fit with codes of ethics and practice standards, at national and international levels.
Keywords: Community Treatment Orders (CTOs), mental health social workers
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  G. Davidson and J. Campbell An Audit of Assessment and Reporting by Approved Social Workers (ASWs) Br. J. Soc. Work, May 23, 2009; (2009) bcp060v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|