Skip Navigation


BJSW Advance Access originally published online on August 1, 2005
British Journal of Social Work 2006 36(4):561-576; doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch272
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/4/561    most recent
bch272v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Selwyn, J.
Right arrow Articles by Quinton, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers. All rights reserved.

Paved with Good Intentions: The Pathway to Adoption and the Costs of Delay

J. Selwyn, L. Frazer and D. Quinton

The authors are all members of the Hadley Centre for Adoption and Foster Care Studies at the University of Bristol, www.bristol.ac.uk/hadley.

Correspondence to Julie Selwyn, University of Bristol, School for Policy Studies, 8 Priory Road, Bristol BS8 1TZ, UK. E-mail: J.Selwyn{at}bristol.ac.uk

The thrust of UK adoption policy is to promote adoption as the best route to a stable family life for children in the care system unable to return to their birth families. However, what we know about outcomes for adopted children comes mainly from studies that report on children already in placement. This article reports on the findings of a study that examined the outcomes of a complete sample of 130 older looked after children who had all been the subject of an adoption best interest decision. Many were successfully placed but, of those who were not, the study was able to identify factors that influenced placement outcome. The negative impact on placement outcomes and the increased financial costs of poor assessment and delays in planning and action are highlighted in this paper. The reasons why delays occurred, the costs of those delays and the impact on child outcomes lend support to recent government attempts to reduce delay by the introduction of timescales into the adoption process.

Keywords: Adoption, delay, permanency planning, costs, outcomes


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.