Skip Navigation


BJSW Advance Access originally published online on September 26, 2005
British Journal of Social Work 2005 35(8):1343-1355; doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch225
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/8/1343    most recent
bch225v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Daniel, B.
Right arrow Articles by Scourfield, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers. All rights reserved.

Why Gender Matters for Every Child Matters

Brigid Daniel, Brid Featherstone, Carol-Ann Hooper and Jonathan Scourfield

The authors are all members of the Gender and Child Welfare Network, which was formed in 2003. This comment on the Green Paper is written on behalf of the network. Brigid Daniel is professor of childcare and child protection at the University of Dundee. Brid Featherstone is reader in Applied Childhood Studies at Huddersfield University. Carol-Ann Hooper is a lecturer in social policy at the University of York. Jonathan Scourfield is a lecturer in Cardiff School of Social Sciences.

Correspondence to Brid Featherstone, Centre for Applied Childhood Studies, Harold Wilson Building, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, West Yorkshire HD1 3DH, UK. E-mail: b.m.featherstone{at}hud.ac.uk

This article is a commentary on the Green Paper for children’s services in England: Every Child Matters. The focus of the discussion is the lack of gender analysis in the document. The article highlights the gendered character of contemporary parenting, and the failure of some of the proposals in the Green Paper to address this. There is also discussion of the need to appreciate the gendered character of childhood, and the implications of this for children’s services. The authors also argue the importance of using a gendered perspective to engage adequately with the causes and consequences of child maltreatment. The article ends with some recommendations for strengthening the gender analysis in the Green Paper.

Keywords: children, gender, policy, practice


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J Soc WorkHome page
T. Spratt
Identifying Families with Multiple Problems: Possible Responses from Child and Family Social Work to Current Policy Developments
Br. J. Soc. Work, February 22, 2008; (2008) bcm150v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J Soc WorkHome page
M. Graham
Giving Voice to Black Children: An Analysis of Social Agency
Br. J. Soc. Work, December 1, 2007; 37(8): 1305 - 1317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
B. Featherstone and S. Peckover
Letting them get away with it: Fathers, domestic violence and child welfare
Critical Social Policy, May 1, 2007; 27(2): 181 - 202.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
B. Featherstone, C.-A. Hooper, and J. Scourfield
Editorial
Critical Social Policy, May 1, 2006; 26(2): 291 - 293.
[PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
B. Featherstone
Why gender matters in child welfare and protection
Critical Social Policy, May 1, 2006; 26(2): 294 - 314.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
B. M. Daniel and J. Taylor
Gender and child neglect: theory, research and policy
Critical Social Policy, May 1, 2006; 26(2): 426 - 439.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
J. Scourfield
The challenge of engaging fathers in the child protection process
Critical Social Policy, May 1, 2006; 26(2): 440 - 449.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.