Skip Navigation


BJSW Advance Access originally published online on August 15, 2005
British Journal of Social Work 2005 35(6):975-981; doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch296
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/6/975    most recent
bch296v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waldman, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Association of Social Workers. All rights reserved.

Using Evaluative Research to Support Practitioners and Service Users in Undertaking Reflective Writing for Public Dissemination

Julia Waldman

Julia is a Learning and Teaching Adviser with SWAP and a freelance researcher. The article relates to her former role as a Senior Research Fellow in the Department of Social Work Studies, University of Southampton.

Correspondence to Subject Centre for Social Policy and Social Work (SWAP), Higher Education Academy, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, SO30 0BS, UK. E-mail: j.waldman{at}swap.ac.uk

Outputs of research are mainly reports, in a variety of formats for different audiences: web-based materials, conference presentations and articles. Usually, these are the researchers’ products, with different levels of input by research participants, dependant upon the participative methods adopted. Two strands of discourse in relation to research allow for inclusion of other potential outputs for research: service user involvement in research and the notion of the research-informed or aware practitioner. This article focuses upon the experience of using evaluative research projects to generate practitioner and user writing for public dissemination, drawing upon these two themes.

Keywords: research writing, practitioners, users


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qualitative Social WorkHome page
J. Trotter, L. Brogatzki, L. Duggan, E. Foster, and J. Levie
Revealing Disagreement and Discomfort through Auto-ethnography and Personal Narrative: Sexuality in Social Work Education and Practice
Qualitative Social Work, September 1, 2006; 5(3): 369 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.