| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Professional Ideologies and Preferences in Social Work: A British Study in Global Perspective
Johanna Woodcock is Senior Lecturer in Social Work at the University of Plymouth and John Dixon is Professor of International Social Policy, also at the University of Plymouth.
Correspondence to Ms Johanna Woodcock, School of Social Work and Primary Care, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK; E-mail: j1woodcock{at}plymouth.ac.uk
This paper comes at a time when the social work profession in the UK is redefining its professional ideology and working practices in the face of key government initiatives for social work education and the regulation of practice. It seeks to contextualize and, thereby, inform these deliberations by providing a cross-national perspective. Indeed, the search for international perspectives that might advise or validate national perspectives on social work has become increasingly important (Midgley, 2001). The paper uses data from a global study (Weiss et al., forthcoming) that identifies and compares the attitudes of graduating social workers at the point of qualification in ten countries representing a diverse range of social, economic and cultural contexts (n = 781). Through a comparison of commonalities and differences of professional ideologies and practice preferences across samples, the paper distinguishes particular characteristics of the social work profession in the UK. Whilst a claim cannot be made to be representative, the findings present a set of empirically based contentions that provide information about what social workers are being trained for and what they prefer to do. Findings reveal a mix of psycho-social orientation, whereby a welfare agenda was preferred—one that co-existed with the espousal of elements of a statutory social work role in terms of ideology, level of practice, choice of technologies, age and population groupings and practice strategies. Whilst such a mix appeared contradictory in conceptual terms, the students appeared to reconcile the dilemma through the espousal of a particular value position. A key finding for policy makers and educators, however, concerns the fact that while the UK students felt willing to work through social problems in individual situations, they were unhappy about the extent to which they were able to utilize their therapeutic skills in statutory social work settings. Their preference would be to work in the independent sector.
Keywords: social work, ideologies, British, international, preferences
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. W. Ross, L. Hooper, E. Stenhouse, and R. Sheaff What Are Child-Care Social Workers Doing in Relation to Infant Mental Health? An Exploration of Professional Ideologies and Practice Preferences within an Inter-Agency Context Br. J. Soc. Work, March 26, 2008; (2008) bcn029v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Cemlyn Human Rights and Gypsies and Travellers: An Exploration of the Application of a Human Rights Perspective to Social Work with a Minority Community in Britain Br. J. Soc. Work, January 1, 2008; 38(1): 153 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Weiss and J. Gal Poverty in the Eyes of the Beholder: Social Workers Compared to Other Middle-Class Professionals Br. J. Soc. Work, July 1, 2007; 37(5): 893 - 908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|