Skip Navigation


BJSW Advance Access originally published online on January 10, 2005
British Journal of Social Work 2005 35(1):73-88; doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch163
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/1/73    most recent
bch163v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Axford, N.
Right arrow Articles by Weyts, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

BJSW Vol. 35 No. 1 © The British Association of Social Workers 2005; all rights reserved.

Evaluating Children’s Services: Recent Conceptual and Methodological Developments

Nick Axford

Dartington Social Research Unit.

Michael Little

Dartington Social Research Unit and Chapin Hall Center for Children, University of Chicago.

Louise Morpeth

Dartington Social Research Unit.

Arabella Weyts

Development Officer for Dartington-i until April 2003 and is now Senior Programme Co-ordinator, Children’s Rights Centre, University of Ghent,Belgium.

Correspondence to Nick Axford, Dartington Social Research Unit, Warren House, Dartington, Totnes TQ9 6EG, UK. E-mail: unit{at}dartington.org.uk

This article considers recent innovations and challenges with respect to the evaluation of children’s services interventions. It sets out a method for designing and evaluating services that is based on research evidence gathered on individual cases and that permits revision of those services in the light of emerging results. It starts by describing briefly different ways of identifying a discrete group of children with similar needs. It then outlines approaches to ensuring that an intervention for those children is underpinned by theory and research evidence–including the idea of ‘logic modelling’–before discussing the importance of capturing accurately how well the intervention is implemented. Experimental and non-experimental methods of assessing an intervention’s effectiveness are considered, with particular emphasis on techniques for enhancing the causal inference that can be drawn from studies and the importance of matching method and purpose. The article also demonstrates how the principles and methods used in relation to evaluating services for groups can be applied in clinical work with individual cases, and identifies the benefits of this general approach to evaluation over and above the information that it provides on what works.

Keywords: Evaluation, Children’s services, experimental methods, non-experimental methods


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J Soc WorkHome page
N. Axford
Conducting Needs Assessments in Children's Services
Br. J. Soc. Work, August 1, 2008; (2008) bcn103v2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 American Journal of EvaluationHome page
M. S. Trevisan
Evaluability Assessment From 1986 to 2006
American Journal of Evaluation, September 1, 2007; 28(3): 290 - 303.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.