Skip Navigation


BJSW Advance Access originally published online on January 10, 2005
British Journal of Social Work 2005 35(1):125-138; doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch166
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/1/125    most recent
bch166v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beckett, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

BJSW Vol. 35 No. 1 © The British Association of Social Workers 2005; all rights reserved.

The Swedish Myth: The Corporal Punishment Ban and Child Death Statistics

Chris Beckett

Correspondence to Chris Beckett, School of Community Health and Social Studies, APU, East Road, Cambridge CB1 1PT. E-mail: c.o.beckett{at}apu.ac.uk

Sweden is widely believed to have an exceptionally low incidence of child maltreatment deaths. Since Sweden is also the first country to have outlawed all forms of corporal punishment, proponents of a total ban on corporal punishment, in the UK and elsewhere,have argued that this demonstrates that such a ban prevents fatal child abuse. While not taking sides on the corporal punishment issue, this paper demonstrates that the argument is misleading on several counts. The available evidence suggests that Sweden has a low, though not uniquely low, incidence of child maltreatment deaths. Widely cited statistics suggesting that Sweden is in an entirely different league from other countries are, however, seriously misleading. Nor does the evidence really allow us to conclude that Sweden’s relative success in this area is attributable to the ban on corporal punishment. Other countries without a corporal punishment ban also have low or lower child maltreatment death rates; the figures that are commonly cited in any case pre-date Sweden’s corporal punishment ban and there are a number of other important variables, other than a ban on corporal punishment, that could account for international variations. The article concludes with some thoughts about the selective use of evidence in debates of this kind.

Keywords: Child abuse deaths, corporal punishment, smacking, international, comparisons


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J Soc WorkHome page
S. Janson
Response to Beckett, C. (2005) 'The Swedish Myth: The Corporal Punishment Ban and Child Death Statistics', British Journal of Social Work, 35(1), pp. 125-38
Br. J. Soc. Work, December 1, 2005; 35(8): 1411 - 1415.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.