Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holland, S.
Right arrow Articles by Scourfield, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Social Work (2004) 34, 21-36
© BASW Trading Ltd 2004 all rights reserved

Liberty and Respect in Child Protection

Sally Holland and Jonathan Scourfield

Sally Holland and Jonathan Scourfield are lecturers in Cardiff University, School of Social Sciences, Glamorgan

Correspondence to Sally Holland, Cardiff University, School of Social Sciences, Glamorgan Building, King Edward VII Avenue, Cardiff CF10 3WT, Wales, UK. E-mail: HollandS1{at} cf.ac.uk

Summary

The paper begins by introducing Isaiah Berlin's concepts of positive and negative liberty and the application of these concepts to child protection. There is discussion of some recent debates on the social and political context of state social work and child protection in particular. The authors then consider, in turn, the experience of children, parents and social workers in the child protection system. There is also a consideration of partnership and rights. The conclusion is that opportunities for statutory child protection to be liberating are limited, but that there is more potential than the most pessimistic accounts might allow. Rather than libertarian child protection, social workers can aim for child protection practice that is respectful. The paper concludes with some principles for respectful practice, based on the ideas of Richard Sennett. Most importantly, Sennett's ideas recognize the importance of relationships in social welfare and acknowledge the context of inequality within which social work takes place.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ChildhoodHome page
D. Reynaert, M. Bouverne-de-Bie, and S. Vandevelde
A Review of Children's Rights Literature Since the Adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child
Childhood, November 1, 2009; 16(4): 518 - 534.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J Soc WorkHome page
M. Millar and B. Corby
The Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families--A Basis for a 'Therapeutic' Encounter?
Br. J. Soc. Work, September 1, 2006; 36(6): 887 - 899.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Critical Social PolicyHome page
P. M. Garrett
Social work's 'electronic turn': notes on the deployment of information and communication technologies in social work with children and families
Critical Social Policy, November 1, 2005; 25(4): 529 - 553.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.