| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
British Journal of Social Work (2002) 32, 683-695
© 2002 British Association of Social Workers
New Labour, Social Justice and Children: Political Calculation and the Deserving-Undeserving Schism
Barry Goldson is a senior lecturer at the Department of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work Studies, The University of Liverpool.
Correspondence to: Barry Goldson, Department of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work Studies, The University of Liverpool, Eleanor Rathbone Building, Bedford Street South, Liverpool L69 7ZA, UK. E-mail: b.goldson{at}liv.ac.uk
Summary
Within a context of national prosperity and relative economic strength, poverty and inequality is rife in the UK. This paper considers the broad contours of such social injustice, before sharpening the focus to examine the specificities of child poverty. The New Labour government has made an ‘historic pledge’ to end child poverty within a generation. The paper traces the key policy initiatives that are being directed to this end and, by drawing on the latest research evidence, it attempts to assess their early impact. Whilst it is acknowledged that the government's social justice agenda has made some progress in ‘tackling’ child poverty, it is further proposed that a more rigorous redistributive approach is required if substantial and sustainable improvements are to be made. Furthermore, it is argued that the social justice agenda is conditioned by wider political calculations, which limit its scope. In this way the imperative to be seen to be ‘tough on crime’ has meant that policy responses to children in trouble have taken a distinctive and increasingly punitive form. By developing the argument that New Labour's electoral ambitions have led it to re-engage with a specious ‘deserving’ ‘undeserving’ conceptual dichotomy, the paper assesses the implications for the treatment of child ‘offenders’ in particular, and the broader social justice project more generally.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. Kemshall Risks, Rights and Justice: Understanding and Responding to Youth Risk Youth Justice, April 1, 2008; 8(1): 21 - 37. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Lipscombe Fostering Children and Young People on Remand: Care or Control? Br. J. Soc. Work, September 1, 2007; 37(6): 973 - 986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. K. M. Tisdall Antisocial behaviour legislation meets children's services: challenging perspectives on children, parents and the state Critical Social Policy, February 1, 2006; 26(1): 101 - 120. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Sharland Young People, Risk Taking and Risk Making: Some Thoughts for Social Work Br. J. Soc. Work, February 1, 2006; 36(2): 247 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Smith Welfare versus Justice - Again! Youth Justice, April 1, 2005; 5(1): 3 - 16. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Smith, E. McKay, and M. Chakrabarti School Improvement in the Marketplace: The Case of Residential Special Schools Improving Schools, March 1, 2004; 7(1): 61 - 69. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Goldson and J. Jamieson Youth Crime, the 'Parenting Deficit' and State Intervention: A Contextual Critique Youth Justice, August 1, 2002; 2(2): 82 - 99. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|