| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
British Journal of Social Work (2002) 32, 135-147
© 2002 British Association of Social Workers
Rethinking Empowerment: A Postmodern Reappraisal for Emancipatory Practice
School of Social Work and Planning, RMIT University, PO Box 2476V, Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia. bob.pease{at}rmit.edu.au
Summary
This article is concerned with the implications of the postmodern challenge to critical theory for the practice of empowerment. How do we conceptualize empowerment from a postmodern perspective? It is argued that the modernist concept of power upon which empowerment rests, can have unintended disempowering effects. By conceptualizing power as a commodity, identities are forced into a powerful–powerless dualism which does not always do justice to diverse experiences. Thus we can sometimes contribute to dominance in spite of our liberatory intentions. It is argued that social workers need to become more aware of the self-disciplining and self-regulatory processes involved in professional work to address the social relations of power embedded in professional practices. Foucault's analysis of how marginalized knowledges are affected by dominant cultural practices suggests a redefining of empowerment as the insurrection of subjugated knowledge. The implications of this redefinition for practice is illustrated by reference to work with indigenous people in Australia.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  F. Coussee, G. Roets, and M. De Bie Empowering the powerful: Challenging hidden processes of marginalization in youth work policy and practice in Belgium Critical Social Policy, August 1, 2009; 29(3): 421 - 442. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Danso Emancipating and Empowering De-Valued Skilled Immigrants: What Hope Does Anti-Oppressive Social Work Practice Offer? Br. J. Soc. Work, April 1, 2009; 39(3): 539 - 555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. M. Tsang Reflection as Dialogue Br. J. Soc. Work, June 1, 2007; 37(4): 681 - 694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. de Montigny Ethnomethodology for Social Work Qualitative Social Work, March 1, 2007; 6(1): 95 - 120. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S.-m. To Using Foucault's concept of power to analyze school discipline and draw implications for school social work service in Hong Kong International Social Work, November 1, 2006; 49(6): 779 - 790. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. N. S. Yum Exploring emancipatory youth work: The case of Hong Kong outreach workers International Social Work, July 1, 2006; 49(4): 471 - 481. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Tew Understanding Power and Powerlessness: Towards a Framework for Emancipatory Practice in Social Work Journal of Social Work, April 1, 2006; 6(1): 33 - 51. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Sharland Young People, Risk Taking and Risk Making: Some Thoughts for Social Work Br. J. Soc. Work, February 1, 2006; 36(2): 247 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Lawler and E. Harlow Postmodernization: A Phase We're Going Through? Management in Social Care Br. J. Soc. Work, October 1, 2005; 35(7): 1163 - 1174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|