Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheppard, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ryan, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Social Work (2001) 31, 863-885
© 2001 British Association of Social Workers

Comparative Hypothesis Assessment and Quasi Triangulation as Process Knowledge Assessment Strategies in Social Work Practice

Michael Sheppard, Steve Newstead, Antonietta DiCaccavo and Kate Ryan

The Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of Plymouth

The Department of Psychology, University of Plymouth

The Division of Psychology, University of Wolverhampton

Summary

Despite a debate lasting some decades, there has been little or no clear resolution about the way knowledge may be related to practice. To a considerable degree this is because of an assumption that knowledge is ‘knowledge as product’: given knowledge, researched and applied to practice. In recent years, the concept of ‘knowledge as process’ has emerged, focusing on knowledge of rigorous ways to think about practice situations. This has generated a focus on hypothesis generation, testing and falsification, as well as lessons to be learned from rigorous methods of qualitative analysis in social research. Rigorous social workers, it has been suggested, would behave like ‘practical qualitative researchers of the individual instant’. However, there is little empirical research on the matter. This paper evaluates process knowledge forms used by social workers. It presents findings that social workers vary considerably in the extent to which they develop hypotheses about the whole case, or aspects of it, in the depth with which they analyse cases, and the systematic way they pursue an information gathering strategy. The paper concludes that there is clear evidence of social workers behaving as practical qualitative researchers, but the rigour with which they do so varies, with fundamental implications for the training process, and the extent to which rigorous strategies, along the lines of research methodology, should be taught.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J Soc WorkHome page
P. Trevithick
Revisiting the Knowledge Base of Social Work: A Framework for Practice
Br. J. Soc. Work, September 1, 2008; 38(6): 1212 - 1237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
T. Farmer, K. Robinson, S. J. Elliott, and J. Eyles
Developing and Implementing a Triangulation Protocol for Qualitative Health Research
Qual Health Res, March 1, 2006; 16(3): 377 - 394.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.