Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barry, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Social Work (2000) 30, 575-595
© 2000 British Association of Social Workers

The mentor/monitor debate in criminal justice: 'what works' for offenders

M Barry

Social Work Research Centre, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK

Summary

There is a move - which originated in England and Wales but is now infiltrating Scottish criminal justice policy and practice - towards increased managerialism and auditing within criminal justice social work supervision and towards more formalized and tenuous relationships between worker and service user. It is suggested that this runs contrary to the needs and expectations of offenders themselves, who rarely have the opportunity to contribute their views on criminal justice social work or on 'what works'. This article looks at the views of probationers and ex-prisoners about social work supervision both in England and Wales and Scotland. It describes one Scottish study, where probationers and parolees considered their 'ideal model' of the social worker to be someone who was proactive and constructive, offering encouragement and emotional support and acting, in their eyes, more like a mentor than a monitor. The research findings demonstrate the need for offenders' views to be given more prominence in both policy and practice, not least in recognizing the significance of factors other than behaviour in determining effective longer-term outcomes; in so doing, it also argues for a more balanced view of the role of criminal justice supervision that incorporates elements of both justice and welfare.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Probation JournalHome page
D. Morran
Firing up and burning out: The personal and professional impact of working in domestic violence offender programmes
Probation Journal, June 1, 2008; 55(2): 139 - 152.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Probation JournalHome page
M. Barry
Listening and learning: The reciprocal relationship between worker and client
Probation Journal, December 1, 2007; 54(4): 407 - 422.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Criminal JusticeHome page
F. McNeill
A desistance paradigm for offender management
JCriminology and Criminal Justice, February 1, 2006; 6(1): 39 - 62.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Probation JournalHome page
F. McNeill
Supporting Desistance in Probation Practice: A Response to Maruna, Porter and Carvalho
Probation Journal, September 1, 2004; 51(3): 241 - 247.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Youth JusticeHome page
M. Nellis
The 'Tracking' Controversy: The Roots of Mentoring and Electronic Monitoring
Youth Justice, August 1, 2004; 4(2): 77 - 99.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.