Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beresford, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Social Work (2000) 30, 489-503
© 2000 British Association of Social Workers

Service users' knowledges and social work theory: conflict or collaboration?

P Beresford

Professor of Social Policy, Brunel University, 300 St Margaret's Road, Twickenham, Middlesex TW1 1PT, UK

e-mail: peter.beresford@brunel.ac.uk

Summary

So far, service users have not been systematically involved in social work theorizing. However, disabled peoples's movements, mental health service users/survivors and other service users have developed their own knowledges based on direct experience and they have generated their own conceptual frameworks and bodies of theory. There are fundamental problems in social work seeking to interpret service user knowledges. Their developments and interpretation require the direct involvement of service users and their organization in social work theorizing. There are strong practical, philosophical and political arguments for involving the knowledges and theories of service users and their organizations in the process of social work theory-building. This paper considers an inclusive approach to social work theorizing. While highlighting the importance of service users and their organizations being effectively included in social work theorizing, it also argues the need for them to have support and opportunities to develop their own prior and separate discussions about theory, including social work theory.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Social WorkHome page
S. A. Webb
Modelling Service User Participation in Social Care
Journal of Social Work, July 1, 2008; 8(3): 269 - 290.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Social WorkHome page
M. Krumer-Nevo
From noise to voice: How social work can benefit from the knowledge of people living in poverty
International Social Work, July 1, 2008; 51(4): 556 - 565.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br J Soc WorkHome page
B. Fawcett
Consistencies and Inconsistencies: Mental Health, Compulsory Treatment and Community Capacity Building in England, Wales and Australia
Br. J. Soc. Work, September 1, 2007; 37(6): 1027 - 1042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J Soc WorkHome page
G. Wilson and M. Daly
Shaping the Future of Mental Health Policy and Legislation in Northern Ireland: The Impact of Service User and Professional Social Work Discourses
Br. J. Soc. Work, April 1, 2007; 37(3): 423 - 439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J Soc WorkHome page
P. Stepney
Mission Impossible? Critical Practice in Social Work
Br. J. Soc. Work, December 1, 2006; 36(8): 1289 - 1307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social WorkHome page
J. Tew
Understanding Power and Powerlessness: Towards a Framework for Emancipatory Practice in Social Work
Journal of Social Work, April 1, 2006; 6(1): 33 - 51.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ChildhoodHome page
M. Hill
Children's Voices on Ways of Having a Voice: Children's and young people's perspectives on methods used in research and consultation
Childhood, February 1, 2006; 13(1): 69 - 89.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Research in NursingHome page
P. Beresford
User involvement in research: Exploring the challenges
Journal of Research in Nursing, January 1, 2003; 8(1): 36 - 46.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.