| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
British Journal of Social Work (2000) 30, 465-488
© 2000 British Association of Social Workers
Reflexivity and the development of process knowledge in social work: a classification and empirical study
Professor of Social Work, University of Plymouth, UK
0 Professor of Psychology, University of Plymouth, UK
1 Senior Lecturer in Psychology, University of Wolverhampton, UK
2 Researcher, Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of Plymouth, UK
Correspondence to: M Sheppard, Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon PL4 8AA, UK
Summary
The relationship between knowledge and practice has been a long standing issue for social work. This is, in part, because, despite the strong intuitive appeal of a position which emphasises the importance of knowledge, this has yet to be established through research. Part of the problem lies with different epistemological positions, and the consequent differences in the examination of knowledge application. Recently, however, there has been a growth of theoretical interest in reflection, reflexivity and cognitive processes as a way of looking at social work knowledge. This process knowledge represents a break from the past where, despite other differences, writers emphasised 'knowledge as product', that is given knowledge, already researched and available for practice use. Despite impressive theoretical developments, however, process knowledge has not been subject to empirical research. This paper reports on work which sought to develop categories and concepts for process knowledge based on research with social workers. Using a novel method, the cognitive processes interview, a number of categories of process knowledge were identified related broadly to areas of critical appraisal, hypothesis generation and the relationship between the two. The paper provides clear evidence of the need for high level cognitive abilities for the conduct of practice, and the need to develop educational processes which will encourage rigour in relation to these cognitive processes.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. Trevithick Revisiting the Knowledge Base of Social Work: A Framework for Practice Br. J. Soc. Work, September 1, 2008; 38(6): 1212 - 1237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Orme and J. Powell Building Research Capacity in Social Work: Process and Issues Br. J. Soc. Work, July 1, 2008; 38(5): 988 - 1008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. G. McCracken and J. C. Marsh Practitioner Expertise in Evidence-Based Practice Decision Making Research on Social Work Practice, July 1, 2008; 18(4): 301 - 310. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. D'Cruz, P. Gillingham, and S. Melendez Reflexivity, its Meanings and Relevance for Social Work: A Critical Review of the Literature Br. J. Soc. Work, January 1, 2007; 37(1): 73 - 90. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Fargion Thinking Professional Social Work: Expertise and Professional Ideologies in Social Workers' Accounts of Their Practice Journal of Social Work, December 1, 2006; 6(3): 255 - 273. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. O'sullivan Some Theoretical Propositions on the Nature of Practice Wisdom Journal of Social Work, August 1, 2005; 5(2): 221 - 242. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. F. Gilgun The Four Cornerstones of Evidence-Based Practice in Social Work Research on Social Work Practice, January 1, 2005; 15(1): 52 - 61. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Owen and J. Cooke Developing Research Capacity and Collaboration in Primary Care and Social Care: Is There Enough Common Ground Qualitative Social Work, December 1, 2004; 3(4): 389 - 410. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|