Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miehls, D
Right arrow Articles by Moffatt, K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Social Work (2000) 30, 339-348
© 2000 British Association of Social Workers

Constructing social work identity based on the reflexive self

D Miehls0 and K Moffatt1,z

0 Smith College School of Social Work, Northampton, MA, USA

1 School of Social Work, Kinsmen Building, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3J 1P3

z Corresponding author

Summary

In this article, the social work identity is conceptualized based on concepts of the self (Benjamin, 1995; Foucault, 1988), rather than concepts associated with ego psychology. Social work students, teachers and practitioners have historically attempted to gain a sense of ego mastery and control by the acquisition of theory to enhance skill-based practice expertise (Austin, 1952; Zetzel, 1953; Bandler, 1960; Memmot and Brennan, 1998). In so doing, they have attempted to manage anxiety as a means to enhance learning. Traditional social work functions such as acceptance, non-judgemental attitudes, and empathy (Biestek, 1957; Woods and Hollis, 1990) have been utilized to encourage practitioners to manage their feelings related to difference. We argue, however, that the social work identity is enriched when social workers allow their selves to be in a state of disassembly in the presence of the other (Smith, 1997). When social workers experience their selves as complex and dialogical, they are more open to the influence of the other (Bakhtin, 1993). We make the case for practitioners to work on a reflexive self rather than attempting to achieve ego control through the management of anxiety.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 International Social WorkHome page
M. Alphonse, P. George, and K. Moffatt
Redefining social work standards in the context of globalization: Lessons from India
International Social Work, March 1, 2008; 51(2): 145 - 158.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J Soc WorkHome page
H. D'Cruz, P. Gillingham, and S. Melendez
Reflexivity, its Meanings and Relevance for Social Work: A Critical Review of the Literature
Br. J. Soc. Work, January 1, 2007; 37(1): 73 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J Soc WorkHome page
K.-s. Yip
Self-reflection in Reflective Practice: A Note of Caution
Br. J. Soc. Work, July 1, 2006; 36(5): 777 - 788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 International Social WorkHome page
K.-s. Yip
Reflectivity in social work practice with clients with mental-health illness: Promise and challenge in social work education
International Social Work, March 1, 2006; 49(2): 245 - 255.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.