Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BELL, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© British Association of Social Workers

Working in Partnership in Child Protection: The Conflicts

MARGARET BELL

Margaret Bell is Lecturer in Social Work at the University of York. Her research interests are in childcare and child protection and multidisciplinary issues. She has previously worked as a guardian ad litem and in general and psychiatric hospitals.

Correspondence to Dr Margaret Bell, Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of York, York, UK.

Summary

This article critically examines the work of twenty-two local authority social workers undertaking child protection investigations. The findings suggest that, while the social workers were committed to being (and believed their practice to be) participative, the dual tasks of making risk assessments for the conference and working in partnership with the families concerned produced conflicts of interests and rights. The impact of these on social workers' engagement with family members, on their assessments, and on the decision making process is explored. It is concluded that the difficulties identified limit opportunities for participative practice, and that these difficulties are endemic to the present system. It is argued that these findings point up the need for a more broadly based child-care service which more appropriately meets the families' welfare needs, and that the contradictory nature of the conference task should be addressed by clarifying the legal base of the intervention and developing other models of decision making. Some ways forward are suggested.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.