Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KNIGHT, T.
Right arrow Articles by CAVENEY, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© British Association of Social Workers

Assessment and Action Records: Will they Promote Good Parenting?

THEO KNIGHT and SYLVIA CAVENEY

The writers are both white and are lecturers in social work at the Manchester Metropolitan University. They have a long standing interest in the child-care field and have both been practitioners in that area.

Correspondence to Theo Knight, Department of Applied Community Studies, Manchester Metropolitan University, 799 Wilmslow Road, Didsbury, Manchester M20 2RR.

Summary

In this article the authors seek to provide a critical look at Looking After children: Good Parenting and Good Outcomes (Department of Health, 1995). They welcome the sentiments underpinning this major contribution, which recognizes the many disadvantages faced by children and young people who are looked after by local authorities, and acknowledge that local authorities have not been positive parents of those in their care. The writers also acknowledge the thoroughness which has gone into the detail of the Action and Assessment Records contained in the above pack. What is questioned is the normative view of parenting and family life which is seen to be at the heart of these documents and the lack of consideration of the resourcing of action plans. The checklist approach is criticized for the way in which it will enhance the bureaucratic nature of being in public care, which in turn affects the relative power positions of parents and children in relation to the local authority and which will impact on the development of a partnership model of care. The writers conclude that children and young people in care are but one group of young people facing disadvantage and deprivation in British society. An examination of their plight and how to address it need to be based within a clear framework of children's rights and a recognition of the power adults hold over them.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J Soc WorkHome page
P. M. Garrett
How to be Modern: New Labour's Neoliberal Modernity and the Change for Children programme
Br. J. Soc. Work, February 1, 2008; 38(2): 270 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Critical Social PolicyHome page
P. M. Garrett
Encounters in the new welfare domains of the Third Way: social work, the Connexions agency and personal advisers
Critical Social Policy, November 1, 2002; 22(4): 596 - 618.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Critical Social PolicyHome page
P. M. Garrett
Producing the moral citizen: the 'Looking After Children' system and the regulation of children and young people in public care
Critical Social Policy, August 1, 1999; 19(3): 291 - 311.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.