Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FEATHERSTONE, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© British Association of Social Workers

What has Gender got to do with it ? Exploring Physically Abusive Behaviour Towards Children

BRID FEATHERSTONE

Brid Featherstone is Lecturer in Social Work at the University of Bradford and a qualified social worker. She worked with young offenders for a number of years and carried out research into alternatives to custody. She also worked in the field of child protection as a social worker and team manager. She is currently carrying out doctoral research into women's violence towards their children

Correspondence to Brid Featherstone, Lecturer in Social Work, Department of Applied Social Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP

Summary

This article explores the lack of impact that feminism has had on analyses of physical abuse. It links this to the kinds of feminist theory which have been used to explore family violence generally. These have been based on fixed notions of men, women and children. It argues for perspectives which are characterized by an appreciation that gendered positions are neither fixed nor inevitable, but, rather, subject to constant struggle and redefinition. It argues that the concept of power may not be the most helpful concept to use when exploring emotional relationships which are characterized by vulnerability and dependency, and that the concept of domination may be more helpful. Finally, the paper draws on the work of Virginia Goldner and her associates to posit the possibility of working on a number of levels, from the psychological to the material.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qualitative Social WorkHome page
P. McNamara
Feminist Ethnography: Storytelling that Makes a Difference
Qualitative Social Work, June 1, 2009; 8(2): 161 - 177.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ChildhoodHome page
J. Brownlie and S. Anderson
'Beyond Anti-Smacking': Rethinking parent-child relations
Childhood, November 1, 2006; 13(4): 479 - 498.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
P. M. Garrett
The pretence of normality: intra-family violence and the response of state agencies in Northern Ireland
Critical Social Policy, February 1, 1999; 19(1): 31 - 55.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.