Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FULLER, R.
Right arrow Articles by TULLE-WINTON, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© British Association of Social Workers

Specialism, Genericism and Others: Does it Make a Difference? A Study of Social Work Services to Elderly People

ROGER FULLER and EMMANUELLE TULLE-WINTON

Roger Fuller has since 1986 worked at the Social Work Research Centre, University of Stirling, where he is senior research fellow and deputy director

Lecturer in sociology at Glasgow Caledonian University

Correspondence should be addressed to Roger Fuller, Social Work Research Centre, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA

Summary

A previous paper published in this journal (Fuller and Petch, 1991) described a preliminary feasibility study designed to investigate the effects of organizing social work teams along specialist or generic lines. The main study which developed from this work is here reported. The study, using modified case review forms, compares the way samples of referrals of elderly people (n=1232) were dealt with at initial assessment and for up to a year subsequently by 15 social work teams of contrasting organizational approach. The latter include specialist and generic teams, and comparisons are also drawn with teams adopting a self-styled community social work approach. Although the organizational agenda has moved on since the study began, the issues are of continuing relevance for the implementation of community care, particularly in view of its growing focus on specialist services. While not arguing that there is any one optimal model of team organization, the paper sets out some of the measurable consequences of opting for the various models; in particular, it emerges that the strengths of specialization are more clearly apparent in certain aspects of their engage ment with clients than in others and at certain stages of that engagement than at others.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.