Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CORBY, B.
Right arrow Articles by YOUNG, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© British Association of Social Workers

Parental Participation in Child Protection Work: Rethinking the Rhetoric

BRIAN CORBY, MALCOLM MILLAR and LEE YOUNG

Senior Lecturer in Applied Social Studies at the University of Liverpool

Lecturer in Social Work Studies at the University of Liverpool

Correspondence to Brian Corby, University of Liverpool, Department of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work Studies, Eleanor Rathbone Building, Myrtle Street, PO Box 147, Liverpool L69 3BX

Summary

Parental participation and, to a lesser extent, that of children at child protection conferences is seen as an important element in resolving some of the conflicts that beset child protection work. Using data from a study of participation in one metropolitan borough, those outcomes that are generally regarded as positive in this respect are critically examined. Our findings suggest that the optimism of advocates of participation is not wholly justified. While at a basic level, parents are better informed than before, their involvement in all aspects of the decision-making process remains very limited. We conclude by arguing that there is a need for more realism about the extent to which all parents can be actively involved in making decisions about the future protection of their children. We point to the need for greater recognition of conflicts of interests between parents, professionals and children and to the need for changes in the child protection conference system in order to ensure more ethical and effective participation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J Soc WorkHome page
M. Millar
'Anti-Oppressiveness': Critical Comments on a Discourse and its Context
Br. J. Soc. Work, February 1, 2008; 38(2): 362 - 375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J Soc WorkHome page
D. Hayes and S. Houston
'Lifeworld', 'System' and Family Group Conferences: Habermas's Contribution to Discourse in Child Protection
Br. J. Soc. Work, September 1, 2007; 37(6): 987 - 1006.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J Soc WorkHome page
M. Millar and B. Corby
The Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families--A Basis for a 'Therapeutic' Encounter?
Br. J. Soc. Work, September 1, 2006; 36(6): 887 - 899.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J Soc WorkHome page
T. Booth, D. McConnell, and W. Booth
Temporal Discrimination and Parents with Learning Difficulties in the Child Protection System
Br. J. Soc. Work, September 1, 2006; 36(6): 997 - 1015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Qualitative Social WorkHome page
S. Maiter, S. Palmer, and S. Manji
Strengthening Social Worker-Client Relationships in Child Protective Services: Addressing Power Imbalances and 'Ruptured' Relationships
Qualitative Social Work, June 1, 2006; 5(2): 161 - 186.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J Intellect DisabilHome page
T. Booth and W. Booth
Parents with learning difficulties in the child protection system: Experiences and perspectives
J Intellect Disabil., June 1, 2005; 9(2): 109 - 129.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.