Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MORAN-ELLIS, J.
Right arrow Articles by FIELDING, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© British Association of Social Workers

A National Survey of the Investigation of Child Sexual Abuse

JO MORAN-ELLIS and NIGEL FIELDING

Jo Moran-Ellis is a lecturer in the Department of Sociology at the University of Surrey. She specializes in research into organizational responses to child abuse, and the sociology of childhood

Nigel Fielding is Professor of Sociology at the University of Surrey, where he is also Deputy Dean of Human Studies. His research interests are in policing and in qualitative research methods. Nigel Fielding is editor of the Howard Journal of Criminal Justice and co-editor of the Sage Series in Social Science Computing

Correspondence to Department of Sociology, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 5XH, UK

Summary

The article reports a national survey of social services and police arrangements for investigating child sexual abuse (CSA). It is now officially accepted as good practice for police and social workers to jointly investigate such allegations. To evaluate investigative practice, the survey aimed to (i) document existing arrangements for police/social services investigation and management of CSA cases; (ii) identify the main organizational models informing such work, and (iii) explore the perceptions of police and social services managers of the key policy and practice issues posed by such work. The criteria for judging the benefits of joint work were: reduction in the number of occasions children were interviewed, clarification of the role of professionals involved, increased coordination of service delivery, and establishment of group support for difficult decisions. While there were signs that some benefit was being achieved, there were also indications of the endurance of problems long associated with multiagency work.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.