Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RAYNOR, P.
Right arrow Articles by VANSTONE, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© British Association of Social Workers

Probation Practice, Effectiveness and the Non-Treatment Paradigm

PETER RAYNOR, Reader in Applied Social Studies and MAURICE VANSTONE

University of Wales Swansea

Maurice Vanstone has a split post between the University of Wales and the Mid-Glamorgan Probation Service.

Correspondence to Dr Peter Raynor, Department of Social Policy and Applied Social Studies, University of Wales, Swansea SA2 8PP.

Summary

This paper reports interim and largely positive results from the continuing evaluation of ‘Straight Thinking on Probation’, a substantial intensive probation programme in Mid-Glamorgan based on the work of Robert Ross et al. (1988) in Canada. The potential effectiveness of this type of programme is then discussed in relation to the influential model of the probation service's role advanced by Bottoms and McWilliams in their 1979 ‘non-treatment paradigm’. Are such programmes ‘treatment’, based on a model of offender pathology and therefore in conflict with the paradigm, or are they ‘help’, based on a model of empowerment? An attempt to answer this question also requires consideration of how far the ‘non-treatment paradigm’ was itself a response to perceived ineffectiveness requiring revision in the light of new evidence. It is argued that such revision need not threaten the underlying moral philosophy of the paradigm.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J Soc WorkHome page
D. Ward
BJSW Critical Commentary: What Works in Probation Offender Management: evidence for a new direction?"
Br. J. Soc. Work, February 1, 2008; 38(2): 395 - 405.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Probation JournalHome page
G. Robinson and P. Raynor
The future of rehabilitation: What role for the probation service?
Probation Journal, December 1, 2006; 53(4): 334 - 346.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Probation JournalHome page
P. Priestley and M. Vanstone
Abolishing probation-a political crime?
Probation Journal, December 1, 2006; 53(4): 408 - 416.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of CriminologyHome page
M. Israel and W. H. Chui
If 'Something Works' is the Answer, What is the Question?: Supporting Pluralist Evaluation in Community Corrections in the United Kingdom
European Journal of Criminology, April 1, 2006; 3(2): 181 - 200.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal JusticeHome page
F. McNeill
A desistance paradigm for offender management
JCriminology and Criminal Justice, February 1, 2006; 6(1): 39 - 62.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Probation JournalHome page
R. Burnett and F. McNeill
The place of the officer-offender relationship in assisting offenders to desist from crime
Probation Journal, September 1, 2005; 52(3): 221 - 242.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal JusticeHome page
M. Israel and J. Dawes
`Something from nothing': Shifting credibility in community correctional programmes in Australia
JCriminology and Criminal Justice, February 1, 2002; 2(1): 5 - 25.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.