Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VALENTINE, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© British Association of Social Workers

The Social Worker as ‘Bad Object’

MARGUERITE VALENTINE

After qualifying as a social worker in 1979 at the University of Warwick, Marguerite Valentine worked in a number of different inner city area offices in London. She has always specialized in child care. In 1988 she was awarded a Ph.D. for an examination of how the political and economic context influences feeling and attitudes towards children. She is now training as a psychoanalytical psychotherapist at the Arbours Association.

Correspondence to Dr Marguerite Valentine, 56 Osbaldeston Road, London N16 7DR

Summary

A ‘bad object’ has been defined as an ‘object whom the subject hates or fears, who is experienced as malevolent. A bad object may be either an internal or an external object’ (Rycroft, 1988, p. 100). This paper explores the circumstances in which public fears and anxieties over child abuse become projected into the social worker. It discusses how social workers introject these feelings, become a ‘bad object’, and how social services departments have developed a number of strategies which defend against feelings of blame and responsibility. The exploration is derived from my own experiences and observations, and applies Kleinian psychoanalytic theory to studies of institutional defences.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Social WorkHome page
S. Houston
Philosophy, Theory and Method in Social Work: Challenging Empiricism's Claim on Evidence-based Practice
Journal of Social Work, April 1, 2005; 5(1): 7 - 20.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.