Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ROBINSON, C.
Right arrow Articles by STALKER, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© British Association of Social Workers

Patterns of Provision in Respite Care and the Children Act

CAROL ROBINSON and KIRSTEN STALKER

Carol Robinson works at the Norah Fry Research Centre, University of Bristol

Kirsten Stalker at the Social Work Research Centre, University of Stirling.

Summary

This article presents the findings of a three-year study into respite care services to disabled children and discusses these in the light of the 1989 Children Act. The aims and methods of the research are first outlined and the various services included in the study are described.

Access to services was found to be uneven, with families from low socio-economic groups and from black and ethnic minority communities apparently having less choice. The characteristics of users are identified: some of these varied according to type of facility used or amount to care received.

Agency records and registers were often found to be inaccurate: the Children Act will require authorities to maintain updated registers. New powers to charge for services may create further barriers to access although requirements to take account of children's racial and cultural background should extend it. The Act will help authorities regulate the amount of respite care children receive and introduces certain safeguards. Its emphasis on consulting young people is to be welcomed. Overall, the new legislation has the potential to improve many aspects of respite care; its ability to do so will depend on having adequate resources.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J Soc WorkHome page
H. Cramer and J. Carlin
Family-Based Short Breaks (Respite) for Disabled Children: Results from the Fourth National Survey
Br. J. Soc. Work, September 1, 2008; 38(6): 1060 - 1075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qualitative Social WorkHome page
A. Cocks
Researching the Lives of Disabled Children: The Process of Participant Observation in Seeking Inclusivity
Qualitative Social Work, June 1, 2008; 7(2): 163 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social WorkHome page
R. Mcconkey, M. Truesdale, and C. Conliffe
The Features of Short-Break Residential Services Valued by Families Who Have Children with Multiple Disabilities
Journal of Social Work, April 1, 2004; 4(1): 61 - 75.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
M Horsburgh, A Trenholme, and T Huckle
Paediatric respite care: a literature review from New Zealand
Palliative Medicine, March 1, 2002; 16(2): 99 - 105.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Intellect DisabilHome page
N. Pike
'All we are really here for is storage, dear'. Psychodynamic approaches to the short term care of children with learning disabilities
J Intellect Disabil., March 1, 1999; 3(1): 3 - 10.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.