Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SHEPPARD, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© British Association of Social Workers

General Practice, Social Work, and Mental Health Sections: The Social Control of Women

MICHAEL SHEPPARD

Michael Sheppard trained in social work at the University of East Anglia and was a social worker in Norfolk Social Services Department. His publications include Mental Health: The Role of the Approved Social Worker (University of Sheffield Press, 1990) and Mental Health Work in the Community: Theory and Practice in Social Work and Community Psychiatric Nursing (Falmer, 1991).

Michael Sheppard, Senior Lecturer in Social Work, Polytechnic South West, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon PL4 8AA.

Summary

A survey was undertaken of all referrals for compulsory admission received by a city mental health centre over a one year period. The centre receives the overwhelming majority of all these referrals in the city. Referrals from GPs were compared with other referrals focusing particularly on women. The results indicate GPs discriminated against women, referring considerably more women than men with less emphasis on major (psychotic) mental illness. The involvement of approved social workers (ASWs) in the assessment process was associated with diversion of many of the women away from compulsory admission, although even they appeared affected by patriarchal assumptions. GPs' behaviour with regard to sections is consistent with reports about sexist practice in other areas of work. This, however, is particularly grave with sections because of civil liberties implications. The article concludes that ASWs need be aware of potential sexist GP practice, that their psychosocial perspective is critical to assessment and that ASW training should include gender issues.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Journal of Social PsychiatryHome page
L. M. Dunn
Mental Health Act Assessments: Does a Community Treatment Team Make a Difference?
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, June 1, 2001; 47(2): 1 - 19.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.