Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RODGER, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© British Association of Social Workers

Discourse Analysis and Social Relationships in Social Work

JOHN J. RODGER

John Rodger gained his B A (Hons.) in Sociology from Leicester University and his Ph.D. from Edinburgh University. He is currently a lecturer in sociology and social policy at Paisley College, and teaches a course on the sociology of deviance to undergraduate students on the social work programme. He has published articles in the Scottish Journal of Sociology, Sociological Review, Sociology and Political Studies.

Dr John J. Rodger. Department of Social Studies. Paisley College. High Street. Paisley PA1 2BE.

Summary

Following a description of the criticism made of contract approaches from the perspective of discourse analysis, the paper draws a distinction between the focus of discourse analysis on the constitution of knowledges and the ethnomethodological project of studying how knowledgeable human beings negotiate meaning through social interaction. I argue that we need a discourse analysis grounded in social relationships. The paper then describes a number of concepts derived from Basil Bernstein's analysis of language and education with the objective of providing a perspective that can l ink an analysis of knowledge and language with the social relationships of power and control which lie at the core of practitioner/client negotiations about agreements and contracts. At the end of the paper 1 stress the importance of social workers negotiating contracts and agreements on the basis of an understanding of their client's everyday accounting systems. This specific idea is connected to the framework of classification and framing of knowledge established earlier in the paper by suggesting that it is facilitated by what the paper calls an appreciative code.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.