Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HEATH, A.
Right arrow Articles by ALDGATE, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© British Association of Social Workers

The Educational Progress of Children In and Out of Care

ANTHONY HEATH, MATTHEW COLTON and JANE ALDGATE

Dr Anthony Heath is an Official Fellow of Nuffield College, Oxford. He was a co-author of Origins and Destinations: Family, Class and Education in Modern Britain (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1980) and has written extensively on the sociology of education.

Dr Matthew Colton is now Lecturer in Applied Social Studies, University College of Swansea. He recently published Dimensions of Substitute Child Care: A Comparative Study of Foster and Residential Care Practice (Aldershot, Avebury, 1988), and is a qualified social worker with considerable experience of work with children in care.

Dr Jane Aldgate is a Lecturer in Applied Social Studies and Fellow of St Hilda's College, Oxford. She is co-editor of Direct Work With Children (London, Batsford, 1988) and has conducted several studies on children in care.

Dr Jane Aldgate, Department of Social and Administrative Studies, University of Oxford, Barnett House, Wellington Square, Oxford OX1 2ER.

Summary

Results are reported from the first of three rounds of testing associated with a longitudinal study comparing the educational progress and behaviour of a group of foster children with that of a ‘control’ group. The latter comprised youngsters who have never been in care but whose families have received social work help.

The educational attainment of both groups was generally found to fall below the national average. Both groups also manifested relatively high levels of behavioural problems, although such problems appeared more in evidence among the social services group.

Data which describe the current home environments of the two groups, and which may subsequently help to account for their respective levels of educational progress, are also presented.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Social WorkHome page
A. Mosek and L. Adler
The self-concept of adolescent girls in non-relative versus kin foster care
International Social Work, April 1, 2001; 44(2): 149 - 162.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
P. M. Garrett
Producing the moral citizen: the 'Looking After Children' system and the regulation of children and young people in public care
Critical Social Policy, August 1, 1999; 19(3): 291 - 311.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Intervention in School and ClinicHome page
A. M. Bauer
Children and Youth in Foster Care
Intervention in School and Clinic, January 1, 1993; 28(3): 134 - 142.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.